All the chairs of that design cranked out by our school woodshop are symetrical. I’d say the designer of that particular chair is just messing with you.
I think that designer must’ve been afflicted with some weird condition where his right shoulder is hitched up several inches above his left. I’d mirror image the back of that chair-- either side, whichever way you like it. I’ve never seen anything like that. In fact, it makes me feel uncomfortable just looking at it.
I say it’s a mistake. If a designer wanted an asymmetrical design, he wouldn’t have just changed that one piece. the entire back would be different. I’d go with asymmetry only if I were making two chairs, and they mirrored each other.
Maybe it was designed like that so you can sort of sit a little sideways, so if you were talking to someone sitting in the chair next to you it would still provide nice support.
I will make two - a left and right version as suggested. My wife agrees that it looks odd on the plan, but I cut out the pieces for the backs and it looks ok in an actual example.
From an online chair manufacturing site, I found the reason that the Adirondack chairs are so low to the ground and difficult to get out of (fall out of?) is because they were designed to be used on hilly terrain.
But as pointed out, there are no examples of an asymetric back shape in photos. It’s tempting to do it just to annoy people.
Could I call the back shape art deco or art nouveau and get away with it? It looks a bit like a stylised duck or bird tail.
that does seem likely. Perhaps it is so your woman servant could serve you drinks from the left or right hand side more easily.