Hiyruu, there’s no need to be rude, we all know what powers are. What I want to know is, what is this crap about “phi times itself or divided by itself yields itself”? You have said phi = 1.618. phi/phi = 1, phi[sup]2[/sup] = 2.617924, neither result is phi. This statement would be true if phi = 1, but that would be pretty useless.
While you’re at it, how about explaining these:
nautical mile grid second
relationship between Platonic solids and atomic table
hologram inside your head (???)
phase entrain
map moebius
vortex pair
I sure do. And I never said that “n” was a fixed value. But “n” can NOT have an arbitrary value for your equation to be of any worth. There needs be some method of figuring out exactly what decides the value of “n”.
Thank you. Now I will teach you how to apply mathematics to the Real World. To use your example: A is the number of apples per tree, n is the number of apple trees growing in an orchard. If you have A number of apples per n number of trees, you will end up with a certain value (x). Ergo - A*n=x.
To continue… say we have 2 apples per tree, and 3 trees, that gives a total of 8 apples (Z*n=x).
See? We do not arbitrarily apply numbers to fill in the variables when attempting to apply a mathematical formula to the real world. So tell me, for the fourth time… How do you determine what ‘n’ is in your formula above? Or do you apply a random number?
I read this whole thread twice [sub]mostly for the one-liners, though…[/sub] and every single one of your so-called explanations reads like schizophrenic babble. From this site:
I invite everyone to take a look at the author of your quote’s resume, I think it speaks for itself.
How are we supposed to take seriously a man who:
1)Claims to have **met with non-localised quantum selves, or Ultraterrestrial Interdimensional Intelligences who call themselves Emmanuel. **
2)Who taught him the translation of our biological body back into its vacuum hyperspatial Original Light Body form.
3)And yet, doesn’t seem to know who Opal is.
4)Has uncovered yet anotherUFO conspiracy. LOL!
There’s tons more, but I started to feel my sanity slipping away and had to stop reading.
Several posters have already asked you simple, yet fundamental questions, and you have chosen to ignore them. Instead, you lectured everyone on powers. :rolleyes:
I do not have a phd in physics, math or biology (not even a b.s.) and yet, I can understand the logic behind relativity and quantum mechanics. Same goes for the logistic equation, or the mechanisms of RNA.
The key word, here is logic. I would really like you to reply to the questions that have been brought forward (the serious ones at least). But please, for Emmanuel’s sake, use logic!
My advice: life is long. You are young. There is an old cliché in the arts that goes: “Know the rules before you break them.” Go to college (assuming you aren’t there already), get a b.s. in physics, and while you’re there why not a masters, even a phd? Then, when you have fully understood all the rules try to prove them wrong. (That is, assuming you still consider them wrong.)
[sub]I guess I can’t count that as a typo, eh? …Hangs head in shame. (BTW, if you ask me, my BA is worth little more than b.s., but that’s another debate.)[/sub]
So, instead of making a sustainable counter-arguement, all you can do is attempt to ridicule someone with a “new-age” ideology.
Science and “Metaphysics” can go together, Newton himself was also a “Mystic”, he was a Rosicrucian, an ancient order that goes back to the dynasty of Thutmose III.
But I digress…
In the equation G=CPHI^n, the value G is dependent (variable). "CPHI^n" describes light being bent recursivley into a phi-based vortex. Think of a light wave entering a tornado.
Just to hijack, the Rosicrucians seem to go back to the 1600s. At least, that’s when we first find record of them. They made claims to go back to ancient Egypt, but most secret societies back then claimed ancient roots, and that probably can’t be taken seriously.
Why should they be expected to make a counter-argument when you haven’t even been able to supply an argument? There are many, many questions that you have ignored, and others that you’ve responded to without actually answering.
Nobody is going to take you seriously if you just post a long quotation and don’t explain it at all. Please note that the purpose of explaining things is to make them clear, not opaque.
That explains my readings. Hiryuu is not a technomancer of any variety. He is a Chorister.
While some members of the Celestial Chorus are admirable people whose morality and genersosity are examples of humanity at its finest, not a one of them has a decent grasp of Science.
Hiryuu, if you wish to proselytize for the Chorus, then do so. But, do it in the language of the Chorus-Lao Tse, Martin Luther, Maimonides, Jesus, or Gautma. Quantum mechanics, transinite matrices mathematics, physics, and advanced geometry are the languages of tehcnomancers. These tongues belong to we Etherists and to our esteemed coleagues the Virtual Adepts. Just as I would not attempt to give the sermon on the mount with my translkight-emmitting-diode-spacial-flux-transducing-wave generator, you should not attempt make physics and algebraic functions from your gospels.
Originally posted by Hiryuu What are you blabbering about?
Don’t feign ignorance, Hiryuu. I accessed the Digital Web as promised. I then accessed the grid sector corresponding to the SDMB and took readings on you. The resulting data proves that you are a member of the Celestial Chorus. To wit my scanning device revealed-
1 Graphing the activity of your frontal lobe and translating that sine function to a Jung algorithm produces a Khopranik-High waveform.
2 Spectroscopic analyses of both your neuroAvatarian composition and your Heisenbergian non-space give the result of Thavarar yellow and Evankrus blue. These colors are found only in Choristers.
3 While on the Web, I ran into my friend and collaborator, Sparks McKenzie. He is an accomplished Virtual Adept, and an all around great guy. Using his fuzzy logic, Mueller-Fokker AI software and my various information gathering devices, we created an imago of you. (Analyses of data yields a pattern. That pattern is a map for going from the known to the unknown. The complete map is an imago). I checked and triplechecked all steps of the process. The patterns and algorithms I used are correct. The imago created from them is correct. Ergo, all data contained in that imago is correct. The imago is a Chorister. Therefore, you are a chorister.
Well, like I said, Rosicrucian myth places its origins back to ancient Egypt, but it probably started at the end of the 16th century and beginning of the 17th as part of a political and mystical Protestant movement. The Rose and Cross were part of Luther’s arms, and Naometria, which is the first work to use the term, is dated from 1603. The movement then seems to get folded into Speculative FreeMasonry, where it stays, until Freemasonry splits, and new founded groups adopt the term Rosicrucian, and the symbols of the rose and cross.
Nah, he’s Hermetic, looks like. Doesn’t matter. Both you two are reality deviants. Come on over to the Technocratic Union, where you can do real science, and not that pseudo-scientific mumbo jumbo.