Does anyone know?
Thanks
Quasi
I have no idea, but it won’t be this thread.
I think it was the ol’
Subject: Pictures of Boobies/Free Computer memory
Message: Reply if you want a paddywack from fat men in tutus.
from back in '88.
Monk
Nope. I replied to that one.
Twice.
Sorry to disappoint you boys, but there are lots of threads with no reply whatever and plenty of views.
They were the ones that died aborning, locked right away, usually because they were a result of a double post. At first it would be obvious what had happened, and people would only click on the open post. Once the locked one separated, and started its path down the thread list, the lock would seem less obvious and people would start to click on it, to see what the fuss was about, only to be disappointed by lack thereof.
Son of a gun. I just turned one up that was unanswered and a real beauty, too. I don’t know how to calculate the number of views, however.
- http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?threadid=67437 The “Teeming Millions” - 0 replies MagicalSilverKey 04-14-2001 01:41 AM About This Message Board *
Better look quick boys. It might get answered yet!
Only 66 views at the moment. No one reads ATMB.
Well, I had this thread:
http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?threadid=64673
which I guess wasn’t as great a debate as I thought. It seemed interesting to me at the time, though.
Well, there is no doubt whatsoever this thread has interesting written all over it, and there is only one response which occurs to me at this time.
The above posting is a good example of Mistaken Thread
Identity (MTI), as it refers to an Original Posting (OP), written by Captain Amazing for Great Debates (GD).
I since add the posting to the right thread, so the posting which is now one posting above this posting can safely be ignored.
But, if you ignore the posting which is now one posting above this posting, this posting must be ignored also.
So, please ignore either both postings or neither posting, and all will be clear.
Nostradamus that was amazing. I had a terrible hangover, which now that I read your post for 20th time, is miraculously gone. Unfortunately I currently do not remember who I am, where I am and what I should be doing.
Wait…I just found this tattoeed on my leg This has almost 200 views and no answer.
Well, therealblaze, I seriously consider answering this post, which is by no means the post above this post, but the post you mention in the post above this post, unless another party posts a post while I compose this post, when the post which is now above this post becomes the post which is two posts above this post.
But, the only answer I can give to the post in question, whatever post that is, is no.
Allright you guys. My brain is now crooked.
I’m telling FairyChatMom if you don’t knock it off right now.
I don’t know, but it was probably one of my threads. I don’t hold a lot of star power, you see.
Of course, everyone here realizes that if you link to a thread, you’re very likely to alter indirectly the view count. So can we limit candidate threads only to those which are not mentioned here?
How did you find that out? I hope you didn’t have to scroll back through all the list of thread links. Is there a faster way?
Nah, SmackFu probably didn’t go to all that trouble. He’s probably just got surveilance cameras trained on all the Dopers, and watched to see who was loading each thread. Piece of cake.
And SPOOFE, that’d sound a lot more convincing if you’d never been Threadspotted.
Monkeypants, I now need to soak my brain in Lysol to get rid of that visual. Thanks.
Robin
Oh, please, it wasn’t my name that drew people to that thread, it was Star Wars.
Maybe I should make a sequel and boost my ego - and post count - a tad. 
Right, so you were holding a lot of Star Power. Like I said.