I liked how we never see Tony Stark incapacitated by drunkenness but we still get pleny of foreshadowing that is going to be a problem with him.
I don’t like the glowy-chest-thing. For one thing, it’s so deep it would displace his heart, not protect it. For another, if the electromagnet’s purpose is to keep shards of shrapnel away from the heart, why not just get them surgically removed?
I read an interview with Paltrow where she said that they had all signed on for three, so far.
Can’t wait.
So, the gist I am getting is that the 6 & 8 year old boys who are dying to see this movie won’t be permanently scarred by anything? They have already seen all the Toho Godzillas, Jurassic Park, Raiders of the Lost Ark and Indiana Jones & The Last Crusade, Forbidden Kingdom, and the Pirates trilogy. Think we’re okay?
My understanding was that the shrapnel was already in his heart, and so removing them would be problematical. The shrapnel was barbed, so it could only keep going deeper, and the magnet kept it from digging deeper.
It’s a stupid concept, of course.
I can’t imagine a better reason, though, for him to have a glowing disc in the middle of his chest.
I used to be able to hit a full run in heels that were maybe an inch shorter than hers, and mine didn’t have the straps keeping them attached to my ankles. That was a long time ago, but her shoes made me nostalgic for those times.
YES. He always seemed to me like the lightweight sort of guy I could toss around like a rag doll, but not here. When he was hammering out the Mark I suit in the cave, it flipped the “ooh, manly-man” switch in my brain. Want!
I haven’t seen the movie, but I have seen a trailer.
In the trailer, a tank (I will guess and say it is a former Soviet T-72 type) shoots at IM. IM takes a half step back to the left and leans slightly back. Round misses. IM shoots and destroys tank with wrist rocket.
The T-72 uses a 125mm shell, fired anywhere from 1700 to 1800 meters per second muzzle velocity.
I think they did it to be true to the comic-book origin story. (Of course, this is 2008, not 1963, so the locale is changed from Vietnam to Afghanistan and the villains are not Viet Cong but . . . well, not jihadists, AFAICT . . . warlords?)
Yeah, that was a pretty clear reference to the Mandarin. Another tip-off was when he started rambling on about Ghengis Kahn - that’s another Mandarin hallmark.
The thing about the Mandarin is that he’s sort of difficult to pull off now without coming across as hugely offensive. It’s not like he’s the Yellow Claw or anything, but the “Chinese mystic with a long beard who wants to take over the world” is something that we don’t really see much of now.
Making him Arabic would be a way to get around that, but that also makes him a totally different character.
The character we saw in the movie actually looks like an Arabic version of the Mandarin’s son Temugin, so it’s possible we could see an older character who actually heads up the organization we saw in the movie.
Well, they announced today that Iron Man 2 is a go for 2010, with two Avengers movies and a Thor movie also in the mix for the same time period. Looks like we’ll have our plates full for a bit. Ought to make Comic-Con even better for the next 3 years.
Welllllll…it’s a movie, ken? None of the things that suit does are really plausible…hell, even walking about is something we really can’t do with an armored suit yet. The power source is implausible. The flight is REALLY implausible.
So, dodging a tank round is really not anything special. How about this. The suit has some sort of automated AI that is in it. It also obviously has radar. So…the suit detected the main gun firing and automatically moved itself out of the way of the tank round and brought the threat to the attention to the squishy lifeform inside…who fired a single shot from a wrist rocket (another of those more implausible thingies) to take the tank out.
Another explaination is that tank rounds aren’t really designed to hit a man sized target anyway…and the Soviet T-72 targetting system pretty much sucks regardless. So…tank fired and missed and IM simply moved by reflex after the round passed…then fired his wrist rocket (which is still implausible) to take the tank out.
-XT
p.s. Go see the movie…it kicked ass. Just leave your skepticism at the door.
If they were going for plausible, Stark would have broken his neck and died the first time he (unarmored) tested his rocket-boots in his lab and went crashing against a concrete wall.
He would’ve died a lot sooner than that. He slammed into that sand dune wearing a ton of metal plating, after launching himself in that first suit. Armor doesn’t help with deceleration- all that energy’s got to go SOMEWHERE. Even if the armor blunted the impact, he still would’ve been crushed by the fall.
The way I see it, the leader of the cave-people was one of the Mandarin’s sub-bosses. Each of them gets a ring as a badge and I guess as a communicator? So he wasn’t the chief, he was someone reporting to a higher-up…
The Mandarin would be tough to pull off. Maybe they’ll just get copies of the aromor of Tony’s villains, since I think they want to keep his baddies tech-powered. The Ghost could be cool.
And you actually could see why Stane was angry with Tony. It wasn’t the bwahaha evil capitalist from Spider-Man and FF. He had been babysitting this company for years, and now Tony has a little boo-boo and grows a conscience. Lots of fun geek-trivia, too, like a Roxxon sign.
And overall it’s much more plausible than, say, Superman.
The round is doing 1700 m/s. What is that, 4 to 5 times the speed of sound?
The suit’s AI would have to move so fast that it might hurt the wearer. (It’s difficult to gauge the distance to the tank in the trailer…) I suppose if the tank were 2000 meters away…
Oh, and I’m playing the Iron Man game now and didn’t think it needed it’s own thread. It’s eh. Not great, not terrible. Fun shooting people with repulsors and flying, but…try it out. Rent first, though.