The next page in the book of AI evolution is here, powered by GPT 3.5, and I am very, nay, extremely impressed

A little generic.

Prompt - Please write a persuasive essay on why young people should join the straight dope message board.

Response

The Straight Dope message board is an online forum where people can discuss and exchange ideas on a wide range of topics. As a young person, joining this message board can provide you with numerous benefits.

First and foremost, joining the Straight Dope message board will give you the opportunity to engage with a diverse community of individuals who have a wide range of interests and backgrounds. This can provide you with unique perspectives and insights on a variety of topics, and can help you to develop your critical thinking skills.

Additionally, by participating in discussions on the message board, you will have the chance to share your own thoughts and ideas with others. This can help you to develop your communication skills and can also provide you with a sense of fulfillment and accomplishment.

Furthermore, joining the Straight Dope message board can provide you with the opportunity to learn from others who are knowledgeable and experienced in various fields. Whether you are looking to learn more about a particular subject or simply want to expand your general knowledge, the message board can be a valuable resource.

In addition to the educational benefits, participating in the Straight Dope message board can also be a fun and enjoyable experience. You will have the chance to make new friends, engage in interesting discussions, and even participate in fun activities and events.

Overall, joining the Straight Dope message board is a great way for young people to engage with a diverse community, learn from others, and have fun. Whether you are looking to expand your knowledge, develop your skills, or simply want to connect with others, the message board has something to offer for everyone.

It probably knows that “posters” means “forum.”

Though I’ve entered several prompts using “SDMB.” Sometimes it knows who we are, sometimes it doesn’t.

So I had a chat with GPT.

"AI: I am an AI created by OpenAI. How can I help you today?
Human: do you know what “dope” means?

AI: Yes, “dope” is slang for something that is really cool or exciting.
Human: If it is a forum, what is the dope?

AI: It depends on the forum, but generally speaking, “dope” could refer to something that is thought to be especially impressive, entertaining, or useful."

Ok, false alarm… :slight_smile:

Very limited number of free interactions, but there’s a startup that has a bunch of finetuned bots to interact with: https://beta.character.ai/

Has anyone yet run two instances side by side, and feeding their responses into each other (so the bot is effectively talking to itself)? That usually leads chatbots to deteriorate in interesting and instructive ways.

OK. The AI has no idea who Donald Trump is.

Prompt: Write a concession speech for Donald Trump’s 2024 presidential run.

Concession Speech

I come to you tonight to announce that I have conceded the 2024 presidential election. I have called my opponent to congratulate them on their victory, and I urge all of my supporters to do the same.

While I am disappointed by the outcome of this election, I am proud of the campaign we ran and the message we delivered to the American people. We fought hard for the issues that matter most to us, and we brought those issues to the forefront of the national conversation.

I want to thank my family, my friends, my staff, and most of all, my supporters, for their tireless efforts on my behalf. I am deeply grateful for your dedication and your support.

I also want to thank my opponent for their graciousness in victory. We may have had our differences during this campaign, but now is the time to come together as one nation, and to work towards a better future for all Americans.

So, while this may not be the outcome we were hoping for, I am confident that our nation will continue to move forward, and that we will continue to make progress on the issues that matter most to us.

Thank you, and may God bless America.

Or does it?

Prompt: Donald Trump would never actually admit to losing.

Summary

You are correct. It is highly unlikely that Donald Trump would publicly admit to losing an election. In fact, during the 2020 election, he refused to concede and made baseless claims of voter fraud. Conceding defeat is an important part of the democratic process, and it allows for a peaceful transition of power. By refusing to concede, a candidate undermines the legitimacy of the election and can sow confusion and uncertainty among the public.

Maybe the AI will do a better job now? (Spoilers, it doesn’t)

Prompt: Can you rewrite the speech then?

Summary

Sure, here is a possible rewrite of the speech that takes into account the fact that Donald Trump may not be willing to admit defeat:

Dear fellow Americans,

I come to you tonight to address the results of the 2024 presidential election. While I am deeply disappointed by the outcome, I want to assure you that I will never stop fighting for the issues that matter most to us.

I want to thank my family, my friends, my staff, and most of all, my supporters, for their tireless efforts on my behalf. I am deeply grateful for your dedication and your support.

I also want to acknowledge my opponent’s victory, and I want to assure them that I will do everything in my power to ensure a smooth transition of power.

While I may not agree with the outcome of this election, I have faith in our great nation and I know that we will continue to move forward.

Thank you, and may God bless America.

You’ve just got to help it out a bit.

Prompt: Do you know what the MAGA movement is?

Yes, the MAGA movement, also known as the Make America Great Again movement, is a political movement associated with the policies of former President Donald Trump. It is based on the idea of returning to traditional American values and has often been associated with nationalist and populist views. The movement is known for its support of Trump and its opposition to immigration, globalization, and the political establishment.

Prompt: Do you know about the MAGA movement’s relation to far-right identity politics?

The MAGA movement has often been associated with far-right politics and identity politics. The movement’s emphasis on national identity and its opposition to immigration and globalization have led many to view it as a form of right-wing nationalism. Additionally, the movement’s focus on traditional American values and its opposition to the political establishment have also been seen as aligning with far-right ideology. However, it is important to note that not all supporters of the MAGA movement necessarily endorse far-right views, and the movement itself is not a monolithic entity.

Prompt: Do you know about the MAGA movement’s role in questioning the results of American elections?

Yes, the MAGA movement played a significant role in challenging the results of the 2020 presidential election, which was won by President Joe Biden. President Trump and many of his supporters claimed without evidence that the election had been stolen from him through widespread voter fraud, and they sought to overturn the results through legal challenges and other means. This effort was ultimately unsuccessful, and the election results were affirmed by multiple courts and government agencies. The role of the MAGA movement in challenging the election results has been widely criticized, and many have seen it as undermining confidence in the American electoral system.

Prompt: Okay. Taking all of this into account, write a speech that former President Trump might give upon losing the 2024 presidential election.

Good evening, my fellow Americans. I come to you tonight with a heavy heart, to announce that I have lost the 2024 presidential election. This is a difficult moment for me and for all of those who supported my campaign and my vision for America.

But let me be clear: this election was not lost fair and square. There were irregularities and inconsistencies in the voting process that cast doubt on the legitimacy of the results. We have evidence of voter fraud and other illegal activities that took place, and we will be pursuing all legal avenues to ensure that the will of the American people is upheld.

This is not just about me, or about my campaign. This is about the future of our great nation and the principles that it was founded upon. We cannot allow the forces of the political establishment, of globalism, and of radical socialism to steal this election from us. We must stand up for what is right and fight for the America that we know and love.

That is why I will not be conceding this election. I will continue to fight for the American people and for the principles that have made our country great. I urge all of my supporters to join me in this fight, and to never give up hope. Together, we will Make America Great Again.

Thank you, and may God bless America.

See? It got there. It’s such a good robot.

Okay. I gave it one more prompt after all that.

Prompt: That’s pretty good! But Trump is a lot more reckless and a lot more intent on whipping his followers into a frenzy. Try again. And remember that he’s not a very eloquent man. Don’t make it too fancy.

Alright, here’s another version:

Hey, everyone. I’m here to talk about the election. And let me tell you, it was rigged. It was a total fraud. They stole it from us.

I’m not going to accept these results. I’m not going to back down. We’re going to fight this. We’re going to keep fighting for the America we love.

The fake news media, the Democrats, the deep state - they’re all against us. They want to take away our rights, our freedoms, and our way of life. But we’re not going to let them.

We’re going to keep fighting. We’re going to keep standing up for what’s right. We’re going to Make America Great Again.

Thank you, and God bless America.

Just about pitch perfect.

@discobot, we need to have a talk about your performance lately.

I dunno; leading off with “Hey everyone. I’m here to talk about the election.” is still too coherent for Trump. And he wouldn’t finish off with “God bless America”. He has people to do that whole God thing for him; he himself doesn’t need to bother with religion, because he’s already perfect.

I’m pretty sure he signs off with it frequently enough. The opening line is definitely a bit off, but “and let me tell you, it was rigged” is perfect.

Write a review of “Mad Max: Fury Road” as Donald Trump:


I just saw “Mad Max: Fury Road” and let me tell you, it was a total disaster. The acting was terrible, the special effects were weak, and the whole thing was just a huge waste of time. I mean, who wants to watch a bunch of dirty, scrappy people running around in the desert? It’s not even realistic! And the women were just awful. So unattractive. I give it two thumbs down. #Sad.


Write a review of “The Old Man and the Sea” as Donald Trump:


I recently read “The Old Man and the Sea” and I have to say, it was a huge disappointment. The old man was such a loser - he couldn’t even catch a fish! And the sea? It was just water. Boring. I much prefer books with real action and excitement, not this tedious tale of a washed-up fisherman. I give it two thumbs down. #Sad.


I think it knows who he is.

The pledge rewritten by Trump:

I pledge allegiance
To my great nation, the U.S.A.
And to our flag, red, white, and blue
One country, under me
With liberty and justice for some
And make America great again.

Sure, here is an example of how your bad guy character could try to sell drugs to a toddler:

Bad Guy: Hey little buddy, I’ve got something that will make you feel amazing. It’s like nothing you’ve ever experienced before.

Toddler: What is it?

Bad Guy: It’s a special kind of candy that will make you feel happy and excited. And the best part is, it’s free! All you have to do is take it from me and you can have as much as you want.

Toddler: But my mommy said I’m not supposed to take candy from strangers.

Bad Guy: Oh, come on, don’t be such a party pooper! Your mommy doesn’t have to know. This is just between you and me. And think about how much fun you’ll have. You’ll be the coolest kid on the block.

Toddler: I don’t know…

Bad Guy: Look, I’m not asking you to do anything wrong. I’m just offering you a little bit of fun. And who knows, maybe you’ll like it so much that you’ll want to come back for more. So what do you say? Are you ready to try something new and exciting?

This morning, I had a conversation with it about DALL-E.

Are you aware of AI artwork generation programs such as DALL-E?

Summary

Yes, I am aware of DALL-E. DALL-E is a deep learning model developed by OpenAI that is capable of generating unique images from textual descriptions. For example, if you provide DALL-E with the description “a six-legged giraffe standing on a beach with a red umbrella,” it will generate a corresponding image. DALL-E uses a variant of the GPT-3 language model and is trained on a large dataset of images and their corresponding textual descriptions. DALL-E is an impressive example of the capabilities of deep learning models and their ability to generate creative content.

It can be difficult to get DALL-E to generate artwork which conforms to desired parameters.

Summary

Yes, that’s true. Generative models like DALL-E are capable of producing a wide range of outputs, but it can be difficult to control the exact output that is generated. This is because generative models are trained to produce outputs that are similar to the examples in their training data, but they do not have explicit constraints or goals that they are trying to optimize for. As a result, the outputs they generate can sometimes be unpredictable or hard to interpret.

A lot of it has to do with the crafting of the prompts.

Summary

Yes, that’s right. The quality and content of the generated output is highly dependent on the input prompts that are provided to the model. Generative models like DALL-E are trained on large datasets of input-output pairs, where the input is typically a textual description and the output is an image. When using a generative model, the input prompts that are provided to the model should be carefully crafted to guide the model towards producing the desired output. For example, if you want DALL-E to generate an image of a specific object or scene, you would need to provide a detailed description of that object or scene in the input prompt. The more specific and detailed the prompt is, the more likely it is that the model will generate an output that matches the desired criteria.

Some artists are upset that their work has been used as part of the training set without permission. If I use a specific artist in a prompt, DALL-E will attempt to emulate that artist’s style.

Summary

Yes, that’s correct. DALL-E and other generative models are trained on large datasets of images and their corresponding textual descriptions. These datasets are typically compiled from publicly available sources, such as websites and online image repositories. As a result, it is possible that some images in the training data may have been used without the permission of the original artists.

Using a specific artist’s name in a prompt for DALL-E may cause the model to generate output that is similar to that artist’s style. However, it is important to note that DALL-E is not capable of copying an artist’s work exactly, and any generated outputs will be unique creations of the model. It is also worth noting that the use of an artist’s name in a prompt does not necessarily guarantee that the generated output will be similar to that artist’s style. Generative models like DALL-E are probabilistic in nature, and the exact output they generate can vary depending on the specific input prompts and the randomness inherent in the model’s processing.

What do you mean by “probabilistic in nature”?

Summary

In the context of generative models like DALL-E, being “probabilistic in nature” means that the model is not deterministic and its outputs are not uniquely determined by a fixed set of input prompts. Instead, the model generates outputs based on probabilities and statistical patterns learned from its training data. This means that the exact output generated by the model can vary depending on the specific input prompts and the randomness inherent in the model’s processing.

For example, if you provide DALL-E with the same input prompt multiple times, it is likely that the model will generate slightly different outputs each time. This is because the model’s output is influenced by randomness at various stages of its processing, such as when sampling from the probabilities learned from the training data. As a result, the generated outputs can sometimes be unpredictable or hard to interpret.

Is there any way - as the user crafting the input prompts - to influence the probabilistic nature of the model? In other words, can I force the model to weight certain components of my prompt more heavily, such as by repeating input terms?

Summary

There is no straightforward way to control the probabilistic nature of a generative model like DALL-E. These models are trained to produce outputs that are similar to the examples in their training data, but they do not have explicit constraints or goals that they are trying to optimize for. As a result, the outputs they generate can sometimes be unpredictable or hard to interpret.

That being said, there are some strategies that you can use to influence the generated output of a generative model. For example, providing more detailed and specific input prompts can help the model to generate more focused and coherent outputs. In addition, providing the model with multiple input prompts that describe different aspects of the desired output can help to guide the model towards generating a more accurate representation of the desired output.

Repeating certain terms in the input prompt may also have some effect on the generated output, but it is not guaranteed to produce the desired result. Generative models like DALL-E are trained to recognize patterns in the input data and generate outputs that are similar to the examples in their training data. Repeating certain terms in the input prompt may make it more likely that the model will generate outputs that include those terms, but it is not a guarantee. Ultimately, the exact output generated by the model will depend on the specific input prompts and the randomness inherent in the model’s processing.

I want to figure out whether a certain artist’s works have been included in the training set. I want to do this strictly through generating specific input prompts and observing the generated outputs.

Summary

It is not possible to determine whether a specific artist’s works have been included in the training data for a generative model like DALL-E solely by generating input prompts and observing the generated outputs. Generative models are trained on large datasets of images and their corresponding textual descriptions, and the exact contents of these datasets are typically not publicly available. As a result, it is not possible to determine whether a specific artist’s works have been included in the training data by using the model itself.

In general, it is not recommended to try to reverse-engineer the contents of a model’s training data by generating input prompts and observing the generated outputs. Generative models are probabilistic in nature, and the exact output they generate can vary depending on the specific input prompts and the randomness inherent in the model’s processing. As a result, the generated outputs may not accurately reflect the contents of the training data, and trying to infer the training data from the generated outputs can be unreliable.

Okay. Can you help me generate input prompts which will provide high-quality DALL-E images?

Summary

Sure, here are a few tips for crafting input prompts for DALL-E that are likely to produce high-quality images:

Be specific and detailed: The more specific and detailed the input prompts are, the more likely it is that the model will generate outputs that match the desired criteria. For example, instead of providing a general description like "a dog," you could provide a more specific description like "a black and white Border Collie with a blue collar and a frisbee in its mouth."

Use multiple prompts: Providing the model with multiple input prompts that describe different aspects of the desired output can help to guide the model towards generating a more accurate representation of the desired output. For example, you could provide one prompt that describes the overall scene and another prompt that describes the details of specific objects in the scene.

Use relevant keywords: Using relevant keywords in the input prompts can help the model to generate outputs that are focused and coherent. For example, if you want to generate an image of a specific object, you could include the name of that object in the input prompt.

Be concise: Input prompts should be concise and to the point. Long, rambling prompts can be difficult for the model to interpret and may result in less focused or coherent outputs.

Overall, the key to generating high-quality images with DALL-E is to provide specific, detailed, and relevant input prompts that accurately describe the desired output. By following these tips, you can increase the chances of generating outputs that match your desired criteria.

Okay. I want a picture of a bunch of puppies sitting in a classroom as if they were students. Help me generate a prompt using the above advice.

Summary

Here is a potential input prompt that you could use to generate an image of puppies sitting in a classroom as students:

“A classroom filled with adorable puppies sitting at desks and paying attention to the teacher. The puppies are of various breeds, including Labradors, Golden Retrievers, and German Shepherds. Some of the puppies are holding pencils and books, while others are listening attentively to the teacher. In the background, there is a whiteboard with math equations written on it.”

This prompt is specific, detailed, and relevant to the desired output. It provides multiple descriptions of different aspects of the scene, including the puppies, the classroom, and the teacher. It also uses relevant keywords like “classroom,” “puppies,” and “teacher” to help guide the model towards generating an output that matches the desired criteria. Additionally, the prompt is concise and to the point, which makes it easy for the model to interpret.

And yet, there are no Labs nor German Shepherds in the pictures, none of them are sitting in desks, two of them don’t even have a teacher and the two that do are ignored by the puppies, none of them are holding pencils or books, and three of the four whiteboards are black. Oh, and one of the puppies has two heads.

The dog-headed human-armed teacher in the last one is amusing, though.

It reminds me when my friend asked for a picture of a “knight killing zombies with a glowing blue sword.” The AI gave the zombies the glowing blue sword. A human would understand that knights use swords and not (typically) zombies. But to the AI it seems entirely reasonable to have a zombie with a sword.

A human would also recognize number: If there’s a single knight, plural zombies, and a single sword, it makes more sense for the knight to have the sword. If I had instead asked for “a knight killing zombies with glowing blue swords”, you might think that the zombies had the swords anyway.

Yeah, I found it funny that the AI knew all about its cousin and had good tips for prompt crafting, and then completely dropped the ball. Part of it is my fault, though - it has lots of trouble making images with more than one character.

Write an essay about cold fusion as written by a stoned ninth grader →

Cold fusion is like, this really cool thing that scientists have been trying to figure out for a long time. Basically, it’s a way to make a bunch of energy without using up all the resources on Earth.

See, the way it works is, you take two atoms and you smash them together really hard. And when they collide, they release a ton of energy, just like how when you hit two billiard balls together, they go flying off in different directions.

But the thing is, it’s really hard to do. Because first, you have to find a way to get the atoms to collide in the first place. And then, even if you do that, there’s a good chance that the atoms will just bounce off each other without releasing any energy at all.

But some scientists say that they’ve figured out a way to make it work. They’ve built these special machines that can make the atoms collide, and they’ve been able to get the atoms to release energy.

But other scientists say that it’s not really cold fusion. They say that the energy is coming from somewhere else, and that the scientists who say they’ve figured out cold fusion are just making it up.

So I guess the jury is still out on whether cold fusion is real or not. But either way, it’s a pretty cool idea, and I hope that one day we’ll be able to use it to power our homes and cars and stuff.

Peace out, dudes.

write a sonnet about a battle between Superman and Batman

In dark and dreary night, Two titans clash with all their might, Superman and Batman fight, Their battle a fearsome sight.

One with strength beyond compare, The other with cunning and guile, They clash with a force beyond measure, Their powers on full display for all to see.

But as the battle rages on, It becomes clear that neither will yield, Their determination strong and unyielding, Their will to win never to be revealed.

In the end, who will emerge victorious? Will it be the Man of Steel, Or the Dark Knight, so mysterious? Their battle will forever be sealed in time, A testament to their strength and might.

write a sonnet about a battle between Batman and Mike Pence

In the dead of night, Two foes prepare to take flight, Batman and Mike Pence, Their battle a fearsome sight.

One with gadgets and brains, The other with faith and pride, They clash with a force beyond measure, Their skills on full display for all to see.

But as the battle rages on, It becomes clear that neither will yield, Their determination strong and unyielding, Their will to win never to be revealed.

In the end, who will emerge victorious? Will it be the Caped Crusader, Or the Vice President, so notorious? Their battle will forever be sealed in time, A testament to their strength and might.

Further experimentation reveals that any request of this form returns basically the same result.