Ah, remember when the Onion was just putting a funny spin on the news instead of reporting facts and tweaking them a bit? It turns out they were actually getting into a time machine and predicting the future literally.
That’s what makes it funny: it has a very real element of truth. All of those “area man”/“area woman” articles are just things that we are very much familiar with, but reframed as news items that normally would never make the paper. The Onion isn’t just about the future–it’s about the here and present.
He superimposed the African-Canadian person onto the family cluster in the original photo. It was two photographs and one head was superimposed over the original family photo," said John Gosgnach, communications director for the social development division.
African-Canadian? I didn’t know the Canadiens did this too.
Maybe it’s more common on the East Coast, but we don’t say this around here. (This is probably because most black folks that you’re likely to meet in BC are either lately of the Caribbean or just plain ol’ been-here-forever Canadian.)
On the other hand, we use “Sino-Canadian” and “Indo-Canadian” quite a bit, although both of these groups have had large, well-established communities here since before Vancouver was even incorporated.
That alteration is pretty embarassing. I picture the photo editor as an Ed Begley Jr. type: “Hmmm… this stock photo isn’t quite diverse enough. Maybe a little more grinning negro?”
The story about the Photoshopping of the black guy is not pure Onion fiction, it’s a parody of a real event. The University of Wisconsin faced some criticism in September 2000 after digitally adding a black student into a photo of a group of white students at a football game. They did it to show their diversity. The Onion piece is from December 2000.
It sounds like you might be playing along with that post, but if you aren’t, take a good look at the date it was posted and the initials of the “contributor.”