Oh, is her dad someone famous? She’s never mentioned him.
Bad taste? Bad taste? Where have you been the last few years?
IMO, his conviction could be used in campaign ads by every Democrat running against a Republican in every district in the country.
Steve Schmidt spilled a harbors worth of tea last night on his Substack:
A choice quote among many…
Long story, short:
Schmidt is making the claim that McCain’s campaign was the first infiltration, by Russia, in an American Presidential campaign. The result was the selection of Sarah Palin, the ur-MAGA, and while she couldn’t resurrect a campaign as moribund as McCain’s, she did prove that a rightist blowhard energized the Republican base.
8 years later, here comes Trump…
A hijiack followup-I wonder if that could be used by his lawyer for a change of venue request? I don’t need an answer, it’s just an interesting question.
Interesting read, but (if I’m following things correctly) a lot of it seems to derive from a New York Times article which McCain denied, but which Schmidt now admits is true. Unfortunately, that article is behind a paywall, so I can’t read it. Without that, it’s a little tough to tell what Schmidt is going on about.
To your point it is definitely written for the person who has kept themselves up-to-date on the travails of Steve Schmidt. There are a lot of references and inferences to previous statements and writings, which does make some passages difficult to parse.
His tweet thread when he first went ballistic is a little clearer. Note: Rick Davis, who ran McCain’s VP search, was Paul Manafort’s business partner.
Mr. Schmidt was also molested as a child, so calling him a “pedo” is doubly evil and sick.
Cut for lack of better information: i.e. I don’t know for sure that Republicans were involved.
Was it evil?
https://nordot.app/896944070993756160?c=592622757532812385 Evil, but thwarted.
In other words the school board says
Don’t say Don’t say Don’t say Don’t say gay.
Dammit. Now I have McCartney’s Goodnight Tonight in my head, and that was not the vibe I was searching for… 
House Republican Conference Chair Elise Stefanik appears to be advocating for starving babies in US custody.
Or giving babies bad formula.
Gotta clarify this (although it’s clair enough from the quoted snippet). Advocating in favor of letting babies starve, not in defense of babies who are starving.
Sounds to me more active participation than merely letting, as in allowing. If they are, by law, to be fed, and she is advocating that their nourishment be taken away, then she is in favor of placing starvation upon them.
Excellent point. My wording was unclear.
Stefanik would like the Biden administration to violate the law and deny sustenance to babies in US custody in order to put an imperceptible dent in the nationwide formula shortage.
It’s a truly monstrous position and it gets worse the closer you look at it.
Well, she could approach the situation like a problem-solver and advocate for the solutions to the supply chain troubles causing the formula shortage, or she could approach the situation like a bloodthirsty sadist and advocate for the denial of food to the babies she doesn’t like. Her choice.
Jonathon Swift was a problem solver. Just sayin’.