What are women doing at the GOP convention anyway? Shouldn’t they be at home baking pies?
Don’t be silly. They need to be there to be supportive.
Besides, someone needs to go fetch more food and drinks when needed.
Do Republicans only watch TLC?
I’ve had my suspicions about the GOP. Their scandals are increasingly scandalous, their nuttery increasingly nutty, the judgment of key persons increasingly poor. My first inkling was McCain’s choice of running mate–a spectacularly unelectable woman to back up an ancient man of questionable health. It would take a tremendously disciplined persona to guarantee his own defeat by associating his own good name with such a buffoon. McCain stepped up and leapt on the grenade, castrating the Republican party.
Then we have the Republican mud-wrestling competition that squirted Mitt Romney out as The Best The Republicans Have To Offer. He’s a contender? No problem Paul Ryan and Tom Head to the rescue and the Republican Party is further refocused into a carnival of WTF?ness. Still serious? OK then, let’s see if we can get a little more condescending with the wimmins!
It’s totally a plot. The Dems have seized control of the Republican Party and are doing their best to discredit and dismantle it from within. No quality control of candidates, double agents, orchestrated gaffes, the works. It’s the first step in eliminating opposition for the ultimate aim: Complete allegiance to the UN, the first and largest step toward establishing a hegemonic United Earth!
Hey, I half believe it (okay, not the UN part). It’s really difficult to understand what’s going on with that party.
And to have their chauffeurs drive their footmen to Costco for more shirts.
…to be turned into rags to wash the cars with.
It IS a plot as ThisModernWorld shows us.
I think “Woman Up” is conceptually related to mounting a horse.
Bleh, I don’t like the emphasis on women having to look attractive for the sake of men, and not doing much else.
I have really short no-maintenance hair and don’t wear makeup.
So you’re saying that if you were a Republican you would be a man?
Sorry, sir. {meekly goes back to the kitchen}
Over there next, to the stain-removing hints booth.
Interesting how there is not one apologist in this thread. I guess there’s no way to spin this.
Just wait, Bricker will find something similar done in Dem convention and rub our noses in the LIBERAL HYPOCRISY!
I was thinking that the message was that women had to look attractive in order to be taken seriously, which is not much better.
The Contrarian Position:
Have any of you ever been caught unprepared by a television camera?
Have any of you ever been in Florida in the summer?
If I were in an environment where my image might be broadcast to million, I might want a little liner, gloss, and blush. Or a ton. Whatever.
In Florida, in August, the only place to apply judicious enhancements would be in the convention hall, lest they melt all over one.
My question is why aren’t men offered a quiet place to a quick toner and polish?
This isn’t about touching up for the camera. It’s called “Woman Up”. The implication being that you’re not really a woman without the proper touch up.
I think you finally hit on the one big issue that has them all scratching their heads and hiding in shame.
Seems like a sort of funny joke to me. But I guess if you’re predisposed to look for the worst possible explanation, you might come to the conclusion you did.
It makes sense to me. Who tends to have bigger hair? Democratic women or Republican women? I hate to generalize, but I think it’s the latter.
The bigger the hair, the more primping required. Add in the Florida humidity and possible gale strength winds, and you are talking about a serious matter.