The Second Stone is a piece of shit

“Galactus in actuality is a sort of god. He is beyond reproach, beyond anyone’s opinion.” - Jack Kirby, co-creator of Galactus

He is not human. Technically he is just energy that uses a suit to contain that energy. Different species see him as looking like themselves.

He was a mortal and from the previous universe and he merged with the consciousness of that universe and thus Galactus was born billions of years later after our universe came into being.

My post is my cite. I have the issue with his origin hanging on my wall.

Jonestown certainly is the source of the phrase in its modern meaning, which is to do or believe something damaging or dangerous because of coercion by a leader or due to peer pressure. The phrase was not used in this sense before Jonestown; the earliest cite in the Wiki article is 1982. (It has been speculated, however, that the Kesey events were why the phrase specifically refers to Kool-Aid instead of Flavor Aid, although early accounts referred to “cool aid.”)

You are only wilfully ignoring what the reporter at ESPN found, several security people from the hotel that saw the incident in full told us that he did spit on her. That the motion of Ray at the beginning and at the elevator is one that is made while spitting could had other plausible explanations but the testimony of the employees interviewed showed why Ray was doing those motions and why his fiancée reacted…

ok then - on with the regularly scheduled pitting.

He’s a giant space asshole with one and only one schtick. I believe his next round with the fans is set in the distant future with Thor. Hope Thor kicks his ass, but as a reboot is about to take place with Thor, I’m not hopeful.

The rebooted Thor is slated to be a woman. This is a comic, so, of course, she will be an attractive woman. Thor as a man is an ill-tempered, dim-witted meathead. But at least we can hope that Lady Sif is not desperately pinning away for her.

I still suspect that Wolfe/Wilson/Shea would have had more to do with its current meaning than is commonly stated. One of the reasons I suspect that is that I think you have the definition quite significantly wrong.

I think it means to believe something through immersion in a particular view, to the point you can no longer see the glaring problems in your position, as if you are drugged. Neither coercion by a leader nor peer pressure form any necessary (or even usual) part of it. For example, one might commonly say someone has drunk of the Truther Kool-Aid. Who is the strong co-ercive leader of the Truthers? What peer pressure is there to be a Truther? Similarly for most conspiracy theories.

Jones killed his followers with a drink. To have drunk of his Kool Aid is to die.

Contrastingly, to have drunk the LSD-spiked Kool Aid of Tom Wolfe, or Wilson/Shea, was to participate in a group hallucination; a far, far closer analogy than anything Jones did.

Anyway, this needs its own thread.

I came back to say this.

I have a cite.

I don’t think so, in particular since the meaning you suggest is not supported by any of the early cites of the phrases’s use.

[Moderating]
Keep your fights with other message boards on those other message boards. Don’t drag it over here.
[/Moderating]

Yeah, but that was Electric Kool-Aid! And the Acid wasn’t battery acid.