I guess that makes sense.
There used to be gatekeepers of information, of news. In the medieval period, that was pretty much the church.
Now, we look back, and see that the church losing its grip on the populace was a good thing, but those who lived through that transition may feel differently.
Instead of having one authority telling you how it is, suddenly Luther comes on the scene and translates biblical works into the common languages, and now everyone has an opinion.
That transition was not exactly peaceful. Still has some lingering resentments.
And now, rather than everyone getting the news from Edward Murrow and Walter Cronkite, and maybe having different opinions as to what that news meant, everyone has their own source of news, that tells them the version or of the slice of reality that they want to know about, what they want to hear. We are not starting from the same basis, from the same foundation of knowledge and information, so we cannot possibly agree on anything meaningful.
The answer is not to bring back the gatekeepers of information, it is to further education so that people are able to understand the quality of information that they are receiving.
How we go about that, when our education systems are failing to ensure even basic functionality, is an exercise left to the reader.