It wouldn’t surprise me if it turns out to be another one of Trump’s “deals” - kinda like his North Korean “deal”. In other words, he’s full of shit.
Wow, so the Mexicans agreed to fund the Wall? Shit, maybe he is the genius negotiator!
They will begin putting them in camps to lower the cost of health care.
I will say this: there is one good conservative out there, and his name is Evan McMullin. Smart. Intellectual. Patriotic. And yes, conservative. Probably would disagree with him on a number of things, but this guy refuses to sell his soul to the devil. I highly recommend his twitter feed:
https://twitter.com/Evan_McMullin?ref_src=twsrc^google|twcamp^serp|twgr^author
I saw a Canadian political commentator earlier tonight who speculated that Trump would change NAFTA’s name and call it a victory and his supporters would buy that.
It’s a pity that the Johnson Amendment doesn’t actually get enforced, since Trump is telling evangelical preachers to campaign for Republicans from the pulpit.
And uh…
“I had the great Robert Jeffress back there. Hello, Robert. Who said about me: He may not be the perfect human being, but he is the greatest leader for Christianity,” Trump said to applause and laughter.
It’s funny that christians are swallowing this guy’s shit. It’s even funnier that the metaphor isn’t exactly non-literal. Good to see that christians hold their so called beliefs as seriously as Republicans hold their own so called beliefs.
Not all Christians. Just the ones that make headlines because they’re as power-hungry and corrupt as the Yam-in-Chief.
Trump warns of violence if Republicans lose the midterm elections.
Do you think we could get him to be more specific? We know they won’t pull down statues, block traffic on bridges, or kneel during the national anthem, because those things are all bad.
Not nearly as coherent as that. It is the CFSG’s style of speaking: the theme is the leitmotif.
The linked video references a recent Trump speech to evangelicals in which he claims that any Democratic victories in the mid-terms will be on the back of violence by Antifa.
So you know, it certainly won’t be any Republicans that start it, nudge nudge wink wink.
Hmm, violence when they win, violence when they lose. Violence in bad times and violence in good times. It’s like the Democrat equivalent of tax cuts for the rich.
What I’d do to see Alphabet buy Trump Tower in NYC, yank of the T, and replace it with a countdown clock until they demolish it. Time it to coincide with the next President’s inauguration.
Maybe it’s a good thing I’m not THAT rich…
I just posted the following in GD.
What’s the betting line on whether it gets me banned? 'Luci? Will you please pronounce a Rite of Extreme Unction for me?
Now THAT’S funny. 'Luci as Redeemer? 
That’s gotta be illegal, right?
I think it’s GQ that frowns on political jabs; they’re fine in GD.
Also, luci doesn’t administer sacraments; he swears out death warrants.
“This night for the first time Antifa regular soldiers fired on our territory. Since 5.45 A.M. we have been returning the fire, and from now on bombs will be met by bombs. Whoever fight with poison gas will be fought with poison gas. Whoever departs from the rules of humane warfare can only expect that we shall do the same. I will continue this struggle, no matter against whom, until the safety of the GOP and its rights are secured.”
… “Antifa regular soldiers” has now joined my list of “words I never thought I’d see together”.