The Trump Administration: A Clusterfuck in the Making

[Kobal2]

@Gyrate

Eh. Both the Spectator (UK) and the Telegraph have been churning out a lot of “questionable” stories in recent years, albeit mostly to promote Brexit and smear Jeremy Corbyn (I mean, there’s plenty of real reasons to dislike Corbyn but that hasn’t stopped the Torygraph from blatant misrepresentation of his statements and actions).

No views on the US site or which way they would fall in support of Trump.

Was the Telegraph the newspaper that actually published a weird-ass fanfiction of a post-apocalyptic Corbyn future ?

Ah, no, it was the Daily Mail apparently. Which, of course it was.

[Gyrate]

Oh yeah, the Mail is far worse. The Telegraph used to be reasonably reliable (albeit with a known right-wing slant) but the Barclays have adapted it to a “post-truth” world.

[DesertDog]

@OttoDaFe

Or perhaps Mazars was counting on CFSG to keep them out of hot water and are now crapping their corporate pants.

Wow. My schadenfreude kicked in so hard it hurt. Either these jaspers didn’t do enough due diligence to realize that Donny Two-scoops has a lifetime habit of stiffing people he owes money to and throwing them under the bus any time he perceives he’s benefit, monetary or otherwise.

-or-

They did know it and the money was too good to pass up.

Either way, fuck 'em.

[Trancephalic]

Fox poll has Trump losing to Clinton in 2020

Hillary Clinton leads Trump in a new Fox News poll. Yes, in November 2019.

I think the writing is on the wall, maybe. It could be some tactic to counter complacency within Trump’s constituency. Why else use Clinton if she isn’t even running?

[Dewey_Finn]

I admit it would be sweet for her to beat him in a second go-round, and she’s probably enjoy it as well. But it would be a sad commentary on the Democratic Party that they weren’t able to come up with any compelling new candidates.

[bobot]

Looks like Faux is doing what they do best, scaring their victims.

[eschereal]

@bobot

Looks like Faux is doing what they do best, scaring their victims.

Fox News: Horror Show not хорошо.

[Crotalus]

The Citrus County, Florida Board of Commissioners has denied the county library’s budget request to renew their electronic subscription to the New York Times.

@Talking Points Memo

Florida’s Citrus Board of County Commissioners voted against allowing the county’s libraries to subscribe to the New York Times in October, echoing President Donald Trump’s complaint that the paper is “fake news.”

The commissioners held a meeting on October 24, during which Commissioner Brian Coleman put forward a motion to approve the Citrus County Library System’s request for a $2,700 digital subscription to the New York Times that would allow library patrons to access the paper for free.

“Do we really need to subscribe to the New York Times?” asked Commissioner Ronald Kitchen after Commissioner Scott Carnahan seconded the motion, prompting chuckles from his colleagues.

“I actually was gonna say that,” Carnahan replied. “I’m gonna vote no for this. Fake news, okay? I agree with President Trump.”

“I will not be voting for this,” he continued. “I don’t want the New York Times in this county.”

Carnahan bookended his dissent with a declaration: “I support Donald Trump.”

“For what it’s worth, Mr. Chairman, I don’t plan on supporting it either,” Kitchen told Commission Chair Jeff Kinnard.

“I’ll withdraw my motion,” Coleman said, which led to Carnahan withdrawing his second.

“Commissioner Kitchen, I truly appreciate that ‘cause I asked why the heck we’d spend money on something like that, so good for you,” Commissioner Jimmie Smith told Kitchen.

“Good for you, Commissioner Smith. I’m glad we’re agreeing on something,” Kitchen said with a chuckle.

“They have a good crossword puzzle, come on,” Coleman joked before moving on to the next item on the agenda.

Link.

[bobot]

I’d like to see the subscriptions they do pay for. The dipshits.

[rocking_chair]

@eschereal

Fox News: Horror Show not хорошо.

this is very amusing. well done.

[Johnny_L.A]

@bobot

I’d like to see the subscriptions they do pay for. The dipshits.

Bullets and Bimbos.
Sorry, I couldn’t find an image of the actual prop magazine from the movie. You’ll just have to settle for the B&B models.

[SteveG1]

@bobot

"(Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus) Vance’s office has agreed not to enforce the subpoena while Trump petitions the Supreme Court. Under the agreement, Trump has 10 calendar days to file the petition.
The timing of Monday’s decision means the Supreme Court could probably take up and decide the case in its current term, which ends in June. It could, however, wait until its next term to hear the case, potentially pushing its decision until after Trump goes up for reelection next year.
The Supreme Court could also decline to hear the case altogether, which would effectively uphold the 2nd Circuit’s decision and clear the way for Vance to get Trump’s tax returns. "
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-taxes/new-york-prosecutors-can-get-trump-tax-returns-court-rules-idUSKBN1XE1O8

Oh Jesus Christ. Here we go again with the stalling, ignoring, and defying.

[SteveG1]

@QuickSilver

His Orange Highness and President for Life.

See if he doesn’t.

Honestly, at this point, how can you be in any way optimistic the center will hold and normal rules still apply?

The rules don’t exist anymore. Not for Trump.

[bobot]

@SteveG1

Oh Jesus Christ. Here we go again with the stalling, ignoring, and defying.

Yeah. I don’t expect the Supreme Court to be in much of a hurry here. But I can’t predict anything anymore. Maybe they’ll refuse to hear it, that’d be quite the shocker.

[eschereal]

@rocking_chair

this is very amusing. well done.

You realize of course that that is lifted right off the pen of Anthony Burgess, right?

[Aspenglow]

@bobot

Yeah. I don’t expect the Supreme Court to be in much of a hurry here. But I can’t predict anything anymore. Maybe they’ll refuse to hear it, that’d be quite the shocker.

It really wouldn’t be that much of a shocker. The appeals court ruling by Katman is narrow, with no conflicting appeals court opinions to be decided by the SCOTUS. Trump himself is not at issue here, only his accounting firm. Katman’s ruling made it clear that Trump’s defenses are irrelevant to the law as it applies to Mazars.

This one could be decided quite quickly. Fingers crossed.

[Czarcasm]

If the Supreme Court decides not to touch it with a ten foot pole, what happens then?
And is it possible for the lawyers to transfer all requested paperwork back to The Prez and wash their hands of the matter?

[Locrian]

@Czarcasm

If the Supreme Court decides not to touch it with a ten foot pole, what happens then?
And is it possible for the lawyers to transfer all requested paperwork back to The Prez and wash their hands of the matter?

This is what I’m wondering. If they don’t touch it, the ruling remains, right? If it’s followed is another story, I suppose.

[Czarcasm]

@Locrian

This is what I’m wondering. If they don’t touch it, the ruling remains, right? If it’s followed is another story, I suppose.

That’s the story I want to talk about-what can happen and what will probably happen. At what point is it guaranteed the tax forms will actually be handed over?

[carrps]

@eschereal

Fox News: Horror Show not хорошо.

Heh, the Clockword Orange horrorshow.