Torture is more against the Geneva convention and that’s also a thing he’s big on. Not to mention pardoning a war criminal.
It’s hard to know if all the people leaving the Pentagon did so because they were aware of a pending attack against Iran and opposed it or because they were unwilling to be part of an immoral army. (The latter is more likely, ftr.)
Just a question that doesn’t deserve its own thread: How many nuclear blasts would be required to result in just enough nuclear winter to offset global warming?
The problem with that, and with most geoengineering, is that, like with global warming itself, the effects are not evenly distributed, and it’s not given that it’s the same uneven distribution as that for global warming, so the result might be a stop to the rise in global temperature, but through regions that haven’t noticed global warming much getting colder.
Seriously, what causes fawning like this from people who aren’t appointed by Trump? I can understand people putting up with his bullshit because they so badly want tax cuts or deregulation or abortions banned or whatever, and I can understand people who wouldn’t be considered for a normal administration kissing his ass to keep their jobs.
But Dobbs is 75, has pretty much everything he’s going to get out of life, and his job doesn’t depend on Trump. And even if it did, he could support Trump without sounding like a Moonie. So what explains his abject worship?
In case it wasn’t obvious, I wasn’t seriously suggesting fighting climate change with nuclear winter. It was just an attempt at gallows humor. And, yes, I know the risk of actual nuclear war is tiny.
Apparently, Individual 1 believes that your allowed to commit war crimes if you decide (rightly or wrongly) that what the other side is doing is a war crime. I am sure that would be a very successful defense in a war crimes tribunal. :smack: