I send him lots of disparaging tweets, and my Twitter handle is a derogatory anti-Trump name, and he hasn’t blocked me. Yet. But I suspect he never reads any responses to his tweets, especially since he gets thousands of them. However, some legal minds are claiming that if, as Sean Spicer said, Trump’s tweets are official Presidential pronouncements, then, if Trump is blocking people on Twitter so that they can’t see his tweets, this is unconstitutional.
Christpher Wray’s law firm, King & Spalding’s, energy practice has represented clients working on deals involving Russia, including the state-owned Rosneft Oil Co. and Gazprom PJSC, according to the firm’s website. It says the firm also represented a large Russian oil company it does not identify that operates in Kazakhstan.
https://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2017-06-07/trump-says-he-ll-nominate-christopher-wray-as-fbi-director
:eek:
That’s heavy stuff, man. How is it not obstruction?
I follow Trump on Twitter and I’ve had a few negative things to say to him. Shit, here’s one:
But I’m not verified. I have no special little blue check mark. I also have only 29 followers, maybe five or six of which are actual humans, so I think I’m safe.
There is a fair chance that he owns property that he has no idea about where it is. I would not be surprised to hear that he owns property that he does not even know about. (Using “owns” loosely, as most of his properties are financed to the hilt and almost certainly belong in practical reality to someone else.)
What if it was a quarter from Qatar?
Also from your link:
Are you sure about those actual humans? According to Eric Trump, Democrats are not even people.
I get the feeling that it’s obstruction, but Trump was too stupid to realize it – in a running theme of his administration so far. Reading that document, it’s clear to me that Trump fired Comey because he didn’t go on TeeVee and say, “Attention Americans. The FBI is not investigating Donald J Trump, millionaire. We now return you to your regular scheduled program.”
Trump brought up that bullshit about demanding loyalty from Comey, despite Comey trying desperately to educate the rube that it doesn’t fucking work that way. Then during their final interaction on April 11, Trump tells Comey (according to Comey), “I have been very loyal to you, very loyal; we had that thing you know.”
Less than a month later, Comey’s out on his ass.
Trump fired Comey for disloyalty. Obstruction of justice was just a fringe benefit.
Товарищ, не хотим знать чего-нивудь об зтом. Пожалуйста, для добре АмеРоссии, будте тихо.
He’d definitely have to ask for help from Mr. Kotter then.
He couldn’t possibly read them, even a few of them, because TOO MANY WORDS (some of them big ones…)
Google translate: “Comrade, we do not want to know anything about this. Please, for the good of Amerossia, be quiet.”
+1
Сосать мой член.
To be honest, that’s coming out of Google Translate, so I’m not sure on the grammar. The words themselves are correct, because I used them regularly with an ex. She was fun (and pretty stereotypical), even if she never taught me any Russian that wasn’t vulgar. I miss her…
Almost sounds like something we might hear on a tape, with Trump responding, “Yes, master.”
Throw a comrade a bone … what the hell does it say?
Google translate: “Suck my dick.”
No wonder you miss her.
That’s Billionaire, with a B, mister.
In defense, she also taught me “Thank you.”
«сосать» looks like an infinitive to me. To make an imperative, it might be «сосай» or «соси». My vocabulary is very thin.
Trump’s obsession with loyalty borders is pathological in its extremity, if Comey’s statements are true, and there is no reason to think they are not.
“I demand your loyalty” is not a normal thing for a person to say. Even in private business, it’s not normal.