Donnie has made his first public comment on Stormy Daniels: he knew nothing about no $130,000 payment.
Actually, I don’t have much trouble believing this. I can picture that Michael Cohen’s job description was: clean up the mess without bothering the boss. He gets wind of Stormy’s potential for disrupting the campaign, writes her a check for the going rate, and submits his expense report to Donnie for $130k in paper clips.
I just want to say that I feel depressingly vindicated.
In a thread some while ago, a poster claimed that the Left must accept Poppa Joe as one of their own, an autocrat credited with killing a lot of people.
I said that the convergence of Right-wing ideology leads to an autocracy, which cannot be counted on to be less bad than what happened in the Soviet Union (qualifying it by saying that most RWs are not pursuing despotism with active intent).
I was soundly berated for making such an outrageous assertion. Now I stand by it more firmly than ever.
I don’t have trouble believing it either. He probably told Cohen, “Pay off Stormy. Keep it close to a hundred grand. I’ll pay you back.” So he didn’t know that the payment was specifically $130,000.
But he knew there was a payment. If he didn’t, Cohen acted without his client’s assent, which is a big no-no.
Hell, If I had millions of idiots hanging on my every word, I might be inclined to say whatever the hell I wanted to, reality be damned. As it stands, I’ve only got a few dozen, tops.
I doubt there was ever an expectation by Cohen that Dotard would pay him back. Cohen is a very wealthy man and 130K is trump change to him. Plus he knows D2S has quite a reputation for stiffing people he owes money to.
I wouldn’t be surprised if a good chunk of Cohen’s salary is actually walking around money, just for bribes and keeping people quiet. He probably has no qualms about spending this money to keep his boss happy and protected, since his boss’s happiness and protection keeps his own gravy train rolling.
A couple PBS Newshours ago Judy Woodruff was raking Peter Navarro over the coals about the tariffs having a negative impact on agriculture and ultimately consumers, as well as the advent of the dissolution of the trade relationship between the US and China. All Navarro could resort to was flotsam about “the US isn’t trying to punish China”:rolleyes: and his tediously repeated (three times?) go-to “this is reciprocation for their spying, yada yada”, always said to weasel irrelevantly from her questions. A shitty showing from him - I didn’t realise he was that much of a vacuous, talking-point moron.
I was getting so bummed out about it I invented a new word:
“Newsea” (or “Newsia”?) - n. getting nauseated from watching the news.
Look at where DC is and look at where Seattle is. Then look at where Pyongyang is. Relative to DC, those other two places are in about the same direction. And Seattle is closer to Pyongyang than is DC, so Bezos is probably cahooting with -un. Might as well lob invective in that general direction to see if they can get anything to stick.
He probably sees the return of stock market bulls as validation for his tariff “strategy”. The irony is that while the stock market might continue to see saw, there is going to be a political cost (and as a result, an economic cost) paid by many of the farmers who voted to make America great again.
The farmers voted for deregulation and for American to be ruled by a white man again; they didn’t intentionally vote to be ruled by an economic moron.