One ticket to Epstein’s Island
Melania: That’s not mine.
One thank you card for visiting Epstein’s Island, signed by Melania trump, with “I had a vunderful time!”.
Melania: I’m telling ya baby, that’s not mine.
One autographed photo of you and Epstein, signed “To my Best Friend: We did everything together, including underage girls, and I Don’t Care Do U?” by Melania trump,
Melania: I don’t even know what this is! This sort of thing ain’t my bag, baby.
One book, “Swinging with Jeffrey Epstein and Me: This Sort of Thing Is My Bag Baby”, by Melania trump, autographed by the author.
Damn, and here I thought Epstein was bad enough to attack Iran over.
Guess whatever is happening over there is really bad if they’re circling back to Epstein for a distraction
Acting AG Todd Blanche tells his boss how he really feels:
“If he chooses to nominate somebody else and asks me to go do something else, I will say ‘Thank you very much. I love you, sir.’ I don’t have any goals or aspirations beyond that.”
Come onnnnn, Streisand Effect!
Where’s the part about being on his knees with tears in his eyes, hmmm?
If he was on his knees anywhere close to the Orange Peril, I doubt those would be tears of gratitude.
Remember when Trump said it was fine with him if Iran charged tolls for the strait?
'Cause he doesn’t.
Didn’t he describe the tolling for safe passage as “a beautiful thing” about a news cycle ago?
Today’s disturbance in the MAGA force: Trump launches a Truth Social tirade against one-time allies Tucker Carlson, Megyn Kelly, Candace Owens and Alex Jones for opposing his Iran “excursion”.
Oo, that must sting.
Could be blowbsck though, since those are some of MAGA’s favorite nutjobs.
That’s odd. Usually he only uses “low IQ” as a synonym for “black”.
Also aimed at women.
As with “nutjobs”, flailing at “low IQ” enemies is another example of massive projection on Trump’s part.
Maybe he’ll challenge them to score as well as he did on his square-peg-in-round-hole mental proficiency exam.
The speculation is that she got word a big document dump—possibly originating overseas—is going to make her look very, very complicit in Epstein’s business.
Whether or not that’s true, Donald must be seething. He’d succeeded almost completely at getting Epstein out of the headlines. What does he have to do, nuke someone?
Yes.
ABC News’s Jonathan Karl asked Trump if he approved of Iran’s plan to charge vessels a fee for passing through the strait — a key channel through which roughly 20 percent of the world’s oil is transported.
“We’re thinking of doing it as a joint venture,” the president told Karl, who shared Trump’s response on social platform X. “It’s a way of securing it — also securing it from lots of other people. It’s a beautiful thing.”
If, after the unprecedented, varied and boutiful litany of high crimes and misdemeanors perpetrated in this golden age of grift, 45/47 gets his comeuppance because he has insulted some favourite MAGA nutjobs I will by necessity harden my position that the oft-cited and fabled “checks & balances” inherent in the US political system are, and always were a total crock.
I guess she really does care…
For those who do not wish to hear her nasty voice I have taken one for the team and have written the transcription of her statement as I, a professional interpreter, have understood her. Honestly, this is what she said read, without omissions:
The lies linking me to the disgraceful Jeffrey Epstein need to end today. The individuals lying about me are devoid of ethical standards, humility, and respect. I do not object to their ignorance, but rather, I reject their mean spirited attempts to defame my reputation. I never been friends with Epstein. Donald and I were invited to the same parties. As Epstein from time to time, since overlapping in social circles is common, in Yew York City, and Palm Beach. To be clear: I never had a relationship with Epstein, or his accomplice, Maxwell. My e-mail reply to Maxwell cannot be catarized [?] as anything more than casual correspondence. My polite reply to her e-mail does not amount to anything more than to tribal knowledge. I am not Epstein’s victim. Epstein did not introduce me to Donald Trump. I met my husband by chance at a New York City party in 1998. This initial accounter with my husband is documented in a detail in my book, MELANIA. The first time I crossed paths with Epstein was in the year 2000 at an event Donald and I attended together. At the time I had never met Epstein and had no knowledge of his criminal undertakings. Numerous fake statemens and images about Epstein and me have been calculating on social media for years now. Be cautious about what you believe. These images and stories are completely false. I am not a witness [?? unclear. Weakness? Does not make much sense either. The interpretator apologizes], or a name witness [sigh… sorry, also unclear], in connection with any of Epstein’s crimes. My name has never appeared in court documents, depositions, victim’s statements, or FBI interviews surrounding the Epstein matter. I have never had any knowledge of Epstein abuse of his victims. I was never involved in any capacity, I was not a participant, was never on Epstein’s plane, and never visited his private island. I have never been legally occused, or convinced, of a crime in connection with Epstein’s sex trafficking, abuse of minors, or other repulsive behaviour. The false smears against me from mean spirited and politically motivated individuals and entities looking to cause damage to my good name to gain financially and climb politically must stop. My attorneys and I have fought this unfound and baseless lies with success and will continue to maintain my sound reputation without hesitation. To date several individuals and companies have been legally obligated to publicly apologize and retract their lies about me, such as Daily Beast, James Cargill, and Harper Collins, UK. Now is the time for Congress to act. Epstein was not alone. Several prominent male executive resigned from their powerful positions after this matter became widely politicised. Of course, this doesn’t amount to guilt. But we still must work openly and transparently to uncover the truth. I call on Congress to provide the women who have been victimised by Epstein with a public hearing specifically centered around the survivors. Give these victims their opportunity to testify under oath in front of Congress with the power of sworn testimony. Each and every woman should have her day to tell her story, in public, if she wishes, and then her testimony should be permanently entered into the Congressional record. Then, and only then, we will have the truth. Thank you.
We know she is not the sharpest knife in the drawer, but who thought this statement was a good idea? Who let her loose in front of a microphone and camera (woman, TV…)? Are they™ too stupid to stop her?
I rest my case. (:facepalm)
But you must love the non-sequiturs.
Give uncle Alzheimer some slack, will you? He. Does. Not… what was the word…? Remember!
Oh, the personal angst and professional pain that must have caused you. You definitely took one for the team. Rest, now 
Gee, that sounds like someone very close to her…
Could the lies be coming from inside the house!
@Pardel-Lux That was above and beyond the call. I’d be glad to contribute to your spa-rest-cure-booze fund.
I am drunk already, thank you very much. I wouldn’t have managed otherwise.
BTW: What the fuck is the word humility doing in this sentence? What does humility have to do with … huh … whatever she means??? The whole speech is like that. 
again.