And Mary Trump, his niece, commented about what this meant for Fred Trump (Donald’s dad) when he did something similar:
From the article:
According to Mary, the elder Trump grew increasingly preoccupied with his hair loss after being diagnosed with Alzheimer’s disease, eventually wearing an ill-fitting toupee and dyeing both his hair and mustache.
“He would leave the dye on too long. So he would end up with a magenta mustache,” she said, adding that family members, including Donald Trump, found the situation embarrassing. “And now here’s Donald potentially… being all obsessed about his hair kind of like his dad.”
Only if the holder attempts to pass it off as legal tender.
As an example prop money for movies is legal, even though it looks a LOT like US legal tender (or, presumably, the tender of some other nation) and that banner across the top saying “movie money” or something of the sort. It’s not counterfeit when used as intended. It only becomes counterfeit when someone attempts to pass it off as real money when making a purchase. As happens a couple times a year at the store where I work.
I will also note that apparently it is also legal for a party to refuse a particular denomination of money for a transaction. So, for example, a business could refuse dollar coins, just as a business can refuse to accept $50 or $100 bills. So even if the Trump coins are legal they can still be refused by a merchant.
Also - it’s not legal to put a live person on US money. So… Trump is either deceased, undead, or breaking the law. Again.
In 2026, the Mint will recognize the 250th anniversary of our nation’s founding. To celebrate this significant milestone, the Mint will redesign select circulating coin designs for 2026. The Mint will also release a “Best of the Mint” coin collection that reflects the rich numismatic history of the United States.
The relevant portion of that 2020 law states: “No head and shoulders portrait or bust of any person, living or dead, and no portrait of a living person may be included in the design on the reverse of specified coins.”
So that is written pretty vaguely, and entirely in the negative (i.e. prohibiting things). The administration is taking the view that the new law implies that a living person may be portrayed on the obverse of the coin, but since there is another law on the books (cited above) that says “only the portrait of a deceased individual may appear on United States currency,” that seems like a stretch to me.
But I agree the Roberts court will interpret this in the manner most favorable to Trump. (Because it’s ok when Trump does it.)
Nice uniforms, have an elegant SS look and feel. Probably manufactured by Hugo Boss? Cool. And those pointy collar insignias, belt buckle and sleeve patches? Uplifting. With a thinly disguised christian cross, so we know who the goodies are (not).
Are you sure it is completely wrong? It seems broadly correct to me, only turned around 180°, like the Global South likes it. Not going to check the details though.
ETA: ninja’d, of course. Serves me right for being so very much not succint.