"…protons do not decay, but that’s only true if they’re kept in the fridge. "
Slip, that is FUNNY!!! LMAO! 
In the beginning there was Aristotle,
And objects at rest tended to remain at rest,
And objects in motion tended to come to rest,
And soon everything was at rest,
And God saw that it was boring.
Then God created Newton,
And objects at rest tended to remain at rest,
But objects in motion tended to remain in motion,
And energy was conserved and momentum was conserved and matter was conserved,
And God saw that it was conservative.
Then God created Einstein,
And everything was relative,
Fast things became short,
And straight things became curved,
And the universe was filled with inertial frames,
And God saw that it was relatively general, but some of it was especially relative.
Then God created Bohr,
And there was the principle,
And the principle was quantum,
And all things were quantified,
But some things were still relative,
And God saw that it was confusing.
Then God was going to create Ferguson,
And Ferguson would have unified,
And he would have fielded a theory,
And all would have become one,
But it was the seventh day,
And God rested,
And objects at rest tend to remain at rest
Whoa man, you should make it a rule not to post before your first coffee.
Well, I mean, the OP all makes complete sense to me. I was thinking the same exact thing over my bowl of Lucky Charms[sup]tm[/sup] this morning, thinking that I really should enlight the Teemings with my great theoretical physics answers, and here I come to find hiryyu has stolen my thunder.
Rats!
What flavor of jello? Is there fruit in the jello? Is there whip cream on top? How can you possible completely understand this without fully defining the basic concepts? And what if you don’t like the flavor of jello necessary for this analysis? [sub]deb who doesn’t like cherry flavor jello**
There are too many unanswered questions.
hmmm…
it seems less a matter of posting before his first coffee, and more a problem of posting after his sixteenth.
Well! I think I know my new sig line!
So, Hiyruu, have you tried this yet? Is the OP a direct result of “your anus involuntarily contracting”?
You missed a mass term in your gravity equation. Common error, Unified Theory being as complex as it is and all. No, no, you don’t have to thank me.
Group hug!
He’s Lucki Chaarms now, I think. I wanna know what “n” stands for in G=C*Phi[sup]n[/sup]. Seriously. And the first one of you who can prove him wrong, raise your hand. So there.
So, he’s discovered the Unified Feild Theory…and posts his findings here.
Well la-de-friggin’-da *I * discovered the Sally Feild Theory:
" U + Like = me"
You may send my Nobel in care of my mother’s house.
**
Well, Einstein doesn’t have gravity in E=MC^2.
The point is that our only definition of mass is where waves can converge non-destructivley and therefore gain inertia/mass. The only geometry that allows waves to add and multiply non-destructivley is Phi (golden ratio). Therefore mass is included in G=C*PHI^n when you realize that PHI is the geometry that permits inertia accumulation which we call mass.
Ehh mods, maybe this thread could be moved to ‘great debates’?
They might at least read my OP.
Thanks.
Fat chance, Shaggy. Twist up another one.
Trust me, you don’t want anyone in GD to actually read your OP, man. They’re not nearly as polite as we MPSIMS snuggle-bunnies.
So have you informed the Nobel Prize committee of your breakthrough, Hiyruu? I mean, you can’t just keep this discovery to yourself and the shlubs on the SDMB. You need to get published, man! You need publicity! You need to get hyped! Books! Movie deals! Talk show appearances! You’ve dropped some knowledge on us here, man, and it’s time to go forth and spread the word to the four corners of the world. Testify! Reveal yourself to the world the genius that you are! No more Internet obscurity for you!
::unknown stranger slips into room and slaps sense into Atreyu::
A word of advice, Hiyruu…
Decaffeinated can be just as tasty as the real thing.
Einstein wasn’t talking about gravity when he came up with the equation.
**
So, when did a “ratio” become a “geometry”?! Man, this New Math really confuses the heck outta me!
I really liked following the links to other physics breakthroughs, strange how they never left mpsims…
on that note how about moving sideways through time?
this time I think my sig really applies
|
|
|
|
V
Makes sense, considering his E=MC^2 has nothing to do with gravity, but rather energy/matter duality.
Errr… yeah, sure. Nothing wrong with modeling a mass as a wave, but from fundamental trig., waves can add and multiply completely non-destructively when the phase variance between the waves is zero and they have the same period of oscillation, not through some mysterious “golden ratio.” And echoing Darwin’s Finch, since when is a numerical ratio a representation of a wave geometry? And no, there’s no mass term anywhere in your G equation. C is in units of velocity. Your imaginary Phi would dimensionless. So G would be in units of velocity. Velocity is equivalent to a gravitational force/energy/field concept? Please.
A simple challenge to your G=C*Phi[sup]n[/sup] equation then; use the equation to explain the observation that the acceleration due to gravity on Earth at sea level is 9.8 m/s[sup]2[/sup], something that first year students of Newtonian Mechanics can derrive.
Typical pseudo-science mumbo-jumbo. A tip; if you want to dupe people into accepting junk information, at least make the junk information believable.
Ok, I’ve read more of tsr0’s usenet posts, and retract the assertion that Hiyruu is him. There are stylistic differences that cannot be reconciled. However, Waverly’s post rang a bell and a little searching turned up this:
How to Good-Bye Depression : If You Constrict Anus 100 Times Everyday. Malarkey? or Effective Way.
The writing style seems similar (I found the author’s homepage once), the “anus-contraction” theme is similar to one of your primary sources and, well, Hiyruu? Are you a published author?
Enquiring minds want to know!
Fenris