I have discovered a remarkable refutation for this, but unfortunately there is not enough bandwith on the server to contain it.
To answer your question, in a word, no. now run along.
OMG. I want that book. From a reviewer over there:
Actually, I’m half convinced Hiryuu is really Alex Chiu. If you’re really nice to him, he might give you a couple of longevity rings and a teleportation device.
Fun with math.
Here’s a little poser for you to solve, Hiyruu.
Choose a number between zero and nil. Multiply it by the length of a piece of string and subtract the diameter of a circle. Now divide by the square root of minus zilch.
Now you know how many people here are amazed by your theory.
And yes, by all means, let’s move this to Great Debates. This ranks right up there with mankind’s discovery of dirt.
By the way, what is your stance on animal rights? Should they be allowed to vote?
And if, whilst toking up, you somehow manage to discover all the remaining secrets of the universe, Hiyruu, I recommend you do what many stoners do:
- Write it down.
- See if it makes any sense whatsoever once you return from La-La Land.
The fact remains that Phi is the only geometry that allows waves to add and multiply non-destructivley, and converge to create inertia.
These truths are well established. Do the research.
It’s your theory, you do the research.
Hint: If you have to use a Spiro-Graph[sup]TM[/sup], it ain’t research.
The golden ratio can be represented both numerically, and geometrically (Phi-Spiral).
“The Golden Ratio”? Does that have anything to do with two sex partners urinating on each other?
Dude,
1:1.617 cannot be represented by a spiral. It can be represented by a geometric patern, but what would make the resultant pattern any different than a pattern representing 1:3.14 ?
Well, what is this Unified Field Theory useful for?
It’s 1.618, and of course it can be represented as a spiral!!! Geeez!
Look here: http://galaxy.cau.edu/tsmith/KW/goldengeom2.html
The golden spiral is the only spiral that is truly ‘scalar’, which means as scale changes ratio stays the same, which allows ultimate compression of waves without destructive interference. This results in waves converging and gaining inertia/mass.
mmm-HMMM…
well, the third part of my sig applies perfectly in this case…
.|.
.|.
.|.
|/
Well, I guess this is better than loons measuring the inside of the pyramids for the date when World War I started, or the crackpots who believe in the Illuminati …
I’ll have you know that this organization does so exist! I’m a Third Stage – oh, wait, you aren’t allowed to hear this!
ah HA!! i knew it!
get the sodium pentathol!
First off, that’s the Spiral of Archemedes. Taking credit for others’ work is generally frowned upon in the scientific community.
Second, nowhere on that page is the number 1.618 mentioned in relation to the spiral.
Third, all spirals scale in the manner you describe.
Fourth, spirals are not waves.
Fifth, the entire “theory” is a load of crap. Nowhere is it explained how it the “theory” agrees with real life observations of gravity (given a mass, how strong a gravitational field should one expect?), how to apply the bogus “equation”, what the terms actually mean (G? Gravity Field? Force? Something else? C = speed of light, fine. Phi = “golden ratio”, n = ???). My original challenge to this “theory” still stands.
This theory is no more convincing or meaningful than the faster-than-light garbage you posted before. It’s all just mindless rambling.
Talking to this guy is like arguing with a glass of water.
Save your strength.
I dunno, Slip. My glass of water rarely starts spouting off about “wave forms of perfect self-awareness”. But then, it went to public school.
Read this:http://www.mcs.surrey.ac.uk/Personal/R.Knott/Fibonacci/phi2DGeomTrig.html before you pretend to know what you are talking about.