The white hood: heritage, not hate!

Well said, but it’s going to fall on purposefully deaf ears. One thing I’ve learned on the internet is that there is a class of people who are extraordinarily smug in their own point of view that it’s impossible to convince them to see another point of view.

Even pointing out the fact that what may be erroneously assumed about someone and their intent is not entirely fair will often lead to being labelled “hateful”, “racist” or some other pejorative. It’s a very nasty tactic akin to the poisoning the well fallacy. Where one can attack the character of a speaker or poster and not even deal with the merits of the argument.

I have lived in the South, the Midwest, and New England. In my experiences they are all nearly equally racist. I’ll give a slight nod to the Midwest for being the most racist/bigoted.

I don’t like what the antebellum South stood for. I don’t like how nasty the South was in terms of Jim Crow and terror towards blacks and other minorities. I’m glad the North thrashed the South. I also don’t like ignorant and smug “regionalists” engaging in one of the few forms of bigotry still acceptable. I almost dislike that as much as I dislike what the Confederacy was and if I were a more irascible person, I myself would get some Confederate gear merely out of spite.

The problem I see coming is that this “outrage” will not stop at the flag it will continue towards names of places, monuments, etc. It’s going to be an ugly debate and I will not be surprised if there is pushback. I’d also like to see some outrage directed at forms of popular culture that glorifies criminal behavior. That stuff actually is a bad influence.

I see, and real people never act in a juvenile way, so clearly my description of how they act is completely unbelievable.

Come to think of it, so are most of the posts in the Great Debates…and all this time, I thought they were REAL.

Just out of curiosity, how do suppose a non-bizarre, non-juvenile person will react? “My goodness, you have a valid point: I must be an ignorant racist asshole. I’ll take this flag down immediately so you’ll have a better opinion of me.”

-VM

Believe it or not, there are good parts of southern culture…things like friendliness, courtesy, self-sufficiency, hospitality, and generosity. It rarely snows where I’m from, but the last time it did, a bunch of rednecks took to the road in their four-wheel drives, looking for people who were stranded so they could pull them out.

There is no lack of non-southerners ready and willing to point out the bad parts of southern culture, but that doesn’t mean that southerners can’t take pride in the good parts.

-VM

As seen in this, from another thread:

Yes. The memorials should be the next to go.
[/QUOTE]

Nonsense. I’ve wasted millions of electrons explaining why this southern pride exists, in my opinion. You could try specific disagreements with my explanations, but you haven’t yet done so.

No you haven’t. The closest you’ve come is suggesting that some southerners, realizing that others think they might be being jerks about it, fly the flag as a giant fuck you to those people. That’s…not the behavior of decent people.

Sure. But there’s nothing random about what I’m saying, so it doesn’t apply to me. It does not include people who make reasoned critiques of large groups of southerners that result in condemning those groups.

Wrong. And this is the sort of argument that correctly gets condemned as a “tone argument.” One of the major movers of social change is to make certain behavior be beyond the limits of polite society, by ostracizing and condemning people that engage in it. That’s what’s going on right now. And guess what: it’s working.

I disagree: instead, it suggests you’re going about this in exactly the wrong way.

You, meanwhile–well, I’ve been moderated for making this personal, so I’ll just ask you to consider whether you really want to condemn others for their ad hominems at this point.

I really wish it hadn’t happened. Slavery was unsustainable, and the cracks were already starting to show. If it could have been done peacefully…but the rhetoric kept ramping up until the South was spoiling for a fight.

Much like the arguments over the confederate flag…the rhetoric keeps ramping up, and southerners just get angrier, pretty much as you’ve suggested. I just don’t see how it’s not obvious that you you’re not going to win over anyone to your side when you lead with, “The evidence clearly shows that you are racist, ignorant, or just an asshole. If you just study history more closely, you’ll see that I’m right.”

-VM

Again: I have lived in the South nearly all my life. I am almost certainly more Southern than you. This is a conversation that’s being had in the South, just like the Civil Rights movement was a conversation spearheaded by great Southerners like Martin Luther King, Jr. One of the pathologies that shows up over and over in white Southern culture is a false sense of martyrdom, a complete inability to listen to criticism.

You ask what the correct response is to being told that one is ignorant? It’s to check to see if one is ignorant. Same thing if one is called out for doing something racist, or acting like an asshole. If the accusation is false, by all means deny it. But to respond to it by doubling down? Not decent behavior.

You listed 3 possible explanations for a white southerner flying a confederate flag, all of them representative of stereotypical character flaws (please do a quick search on “fundamental attribution error”; it’s a natural human tendency). I offered additional possibilities. If that isn’t specific enough for you, it’s because you can’t seem to digest the possibility that someone can disagree with you unless there’s something wrong with them.

Neither is characterizing a group of people–most of whom you don’t know–as being ignorant, racist, or assholes. Funny how quickly this turns into you challenging me to prove that I’m a decent person. I’ll let you go first.

I’m happy to just let this hang there, with your name beside it.

Yes, you’re achieving great things here. You should be really proud.

When I had kids, I was dismayed to see how childishly they behaved, so I pointed out to them daily, “You’re childish and immature and I don’t want to be seen with you.” Eventually, they started acting more like adults. It’s really lucky think I was there to help them.

What do you think I’m trying to “go about”? Trying to make you a more persuasive communicator? Sounds like a little too quixotic of a quest for me.

Nah. I’m afraid if I start condemning people it would put me in company I’d rather not keep.

-VM

No, you didn’t list additional possibilities. I already discussed the ones you offered. As for the rest of it, you continue not to say anything substantive, so I think we’re done.

I was born in the middle part of Alabama, and I lived there for 30 years straight. My first car tag said “Heart Of Dixie” on it. I learned how to catch fish with a cane pole. How southern do I need to be to qualify, in your opinion?

Besides, how is claiming to be “more southern” any different than claiming to be “more pregnant”?

I’m not sure what you mean by “this”, but I will agree that there are many conversations being had in the South. I’m sure that your name-calling is contributing in a way that would make Martin Luther King, Jr. really proud.

So, not liking it when someone insults you is a “pathology”?

One of the pathologies that shows up among liberals is self-righteousness, a complete inability to listen to opinions different from your own.

I don’t recall asking any such thing. I do recall suggesting that insulting people is not a good way to convince them to change their behavior. It IS a good way to get punched in the mouth, and if you don’t know that, well, you live in a different South than the one that I know.

btw, I’ve carefully checked myself for ignorance, and since no one in this thread has mentioned anything about southern history or culture that I didn’t already know, I’m feeling okay. I have to ask, though, did you come up with any interesting findings when you checked to see if you were acting like an asshole? I would’ve said that a tendency to insult groups of southerners (or to “condemn” them while trying to sound reasonable) would be, at the very least, a cause for concern.

In my experience, when I’m in the right, I find I can usually convince others using arguments that appeal to their values, with no need for blanket attacks on their character. Then again, it just hit me: You’re not trying to talk to southerners; you’re just talking about them.

So, in addition to our other flaws, Southerners have a tendency to act in a way you consider “indecent”. Honestly, if you really have spent any time living in the south, I wonder you could stand it.

-VM

Assuming that someone is racist because they have a southern accent and speak with what seems to be an uneducated vocabulary, that would be wrong. To assume someone is racist because they are using a symbol used by slave owners and segregationists is indeed the correct assumption. Even if that person is “not really racist” (which I wholeheartedly do not believe) the fact that they choose that symbol that has that connotation is enough for me.

And indeed they should be. Black people were raped, mutilated, beaten, murdered, terrorized and oppressed. And forced to work work under horrible conditions. And had their wives and daughters raped and had family members sold off to other plantations. Life was constant fear and oppression. Do you disagree with any of this? If you do not disagree then why do you think we should honor the leaders who actively fought to prevent these practices from being stopped?

The mature response, sense the flag represents hatred and oppression, slavery and segregation, would be to have nothing to do with it in any way at all.

Somehow, these statements don’t seem compatible.

Fair enough, but if you keep offering veiled insults to southerners in this way, I will continue to respond. Because, see, I’m not doing this for you. It’s for the benefit of other people in this thread. You know, the ones who listen when the other person is talking.

That is to say, you can ignore me if you like (which isn’t childish at all, by the way), but I won’t ignore you.

-VM

Yes but how is that represented by the confederate flag? Those were not the stated aims of either the CSA or Segregationists. In fact, the stated aims of both groups is quite the opposite of friendliness, courtesy, self-sufficiency, hospitality, and generosity, which, I agree, southerners posses.

Just to be clear, you’re saying that you will call someone a racist, even acknowledging that the person might not be a racist.

That’s certainly your option, but it’s not a stand I would take and brag about.

-VM

I’m sorry. Your answer confuses me. What are you saying that this is the mature response to?

I can’t quite follow the chain of behavior: I call you an ignorant racist asshole, and you respond by renouncing all association with the confederate flag? Seriously, you know mature people who respond this way to insults?

I suppose it could just be that, since I live in the South, I don’t actually know any mature people…

-VM

No, see ,“Southern Pride” proponents do not responded to reason, logic, or appeals to take into account the feelings of others. So claiming that we are just “insulting southerners” as a means of change is inaccurate.

Yes, because that is the way a person who is interested in reason and open mindedness reacts, to punch someone when their cultural identity is attacked.

Assuming that someone is racist because they have a southern accent and speak with what seems to be an uneducated vocabulary, that would be wrong. To assume someone is racist because they are using a symbol used by slave owners and segregationists is indeed the correct assumption. Even if that person is “not really racist” (which I wholeheartedly do not believe) the fact that they choose that symbol that has that connotation is enough for me.

Essentially what you are saying, you (username) smartass, is that you are fully aware of the horrors of slavery and the oppression of segregation, but because you like “being a southerner” you think that if they want, a southerner should be able to fly the Confederate Flag even if it very legitimately offends a great many people. Your continued insistence to put “southern pride” ahead of the very legitimate objections of (primarily) African Americans just shows lack of sensitivity and a certain amount of arrogance, which I guess you call, self reliance or something like that.

I don’t know how else I can say this. A person can fly a confederate flag without intending to support the CSA (which doesn’t exist) or the Segregationists (which I’m not sure ever existed as an organized group with a flag). The issue is NOT what a segregationist means when they wave a flag. The issue is what the current person, in the present moment, means by it.

So, while you maintain that the flag represents the CSA or Jim Crow, and you use history to support it, for many southerners that flag represents the South as a whole, including the good and the bad. It represents people who may not be proud of all of their history, but are proud to have survived it. As long as you keep insisting that the flag can’t represent anything but what you say it does, you may as well be talking to the wall.

I think a much better approach is the one that I have hinted at (apparently, hints have to be really LOUD in this forum): Even though you’re not a racist, there are still way too many racists carrying this flag. Are you sure you want to risk being confused with them?

If you say it THAT way, who knows, there might still be a Southerner or two listening to you when you get to the question mark.

-VM

That’s already been said, and the people you are defending still cling to the flag and concepts like southern pride. Please stop pretending that reasonable debate or reasonable requests are going to produce change. It has already been tried.