Oh, for heaven’s sake. Are you even listening to yourself?
What’s more likely?
Or…
It feels like we’re edging into Sovereign Citizen territory here - CG is demanding that the “judge” provide written confirmation of a thing which is self-evident.
I think we’ve indulged your objections about this, and your other observations quite reasonably. If you are asking for more you will have to get used to disappointment. I understand your concerns may not have been addressed to your satisfaction, but they were addressed none the less. Absent the need for further explanation, I think we are just about done here.
Not quite. I think he has demonstrated a clear animus that will cause any post I make in Great Debates to not be evaluated impartially.
I mean, you guys seem to ridicule anyone who dares make a complaint in this forum, so it’s hard to read whether it’s personal or not. I made a minor complaint. You guys kinda lost your shit. Colibri especially.
Colibri’s not even a Great Debates moderator for crying out loud.
At least try, will you?
You, personally, have been reasonable. I absolutely concur with that, though I disagree with your conclusion.
I apologize, I don’t keep track of which moderators are assigned to which forums. I assumed from his vehemence here that he had some sort of personal stake in the discussion, and was a GD mod. Correction noted!
OK, thanks for the clarification. I don’t agree with that, but at least I think we have a more accurate view of what you’re trying to say. I really did think your earlier post could be read to say you thought were no longer allowed to post in GD.
It’s a plausible reading. My posting style, even when I’m serious about something, tends to be playful, which sometimes leads to ambiguity. I can post in ‘robot mode’, as I am doing now, but it’s less engaging for me so I seldom do it.
As has been pointed out, I am not a GD moderator and so would not be moving threads out of that forum. In any case I was not suggesting that you be prevented from posting in GD, just that if you thought that the OP was framed as a proper debate, your debating experience was evidently inadequate to effectively participate in that forum.
I hold no personal animus towards you. However, I don’t feel that beating a dead horse in ATMB for days on end over a trivial complaint that has been responded to by the moderators and which has received no support from other posters is a productive use of this forum.
MINOR? YOU GUYS?
Pot, meet kettle.
Has someone made a minor complaint to me that I’ve gotten abusive about? I can’t sensibly interpret your comment any other way, but I don’t recall any similar incident. Could you clarify?
At this point, I am only responding to correct misperceptions and factual errors, and to respond to personal attacks. I put down the horse pulper a while ago.
You are not coming across well in this thread at all. Your posts are hyperbolic, obtuse and unreasonable.
In comparison, the modes are coming across as extremely reasonable (though they seem to be handling you with kid gloves). They, and the original thread being moved, are correct. You are incorrect.
Just so you can’t keep repeating that it’s “only 2 people and a handful of modes” who disagree with you.
He’s doing the same shtick in the Bricker pit thread. Hope everything is ok in his life.
Your opinion means so much to me.
The modes? 
As far as I know, I haven’t been repeating it. Check your screen for stutter.
My pit posts are hyperbolic? Oh, no!
I’m doing fine, thanks. A little bored this week waiting on tech support to get back to me on a few things.
Aww, bless.
From ghoulies and ghosties
And long-legged beasties
And boards with rules set in stone
Good Lord, deliver us!
Vague is good, vague respects members as intelligent adults and allows them to steer by their own compass and experience. Please don’t ever change!