Post claiming to have found irrefutable evidence of his counter-hypothesis. Poster goes to the trouble of provide no less than five URLs pointing to articles published by http://www.theonion.com : the top new source on the web.
Post offering the suspicion that Nurlman is a troll.
Well written but irrelevant post, designed primarily to call attention to the poster, inflate post count, and show other posters how clever the writer is.
Short, but witty comment only tangently related to OP posted a day and a half after interest in the thread has waned. Gratuitous mention of post count milestone.
Post which wildly misinterprets not only OP, but following posts addressing OP. Unfounded claim that OP was somehow deragatory towards poster. Ad hominem attack, plus tedious correction of various grammar and spelling errors in other posts. Negative generalizations about SDMB members and administration.
Ad hominem counterattack, followed by rant about the irrelevance of spelling, grammar, and punctuation.
Oblique remark on OP
Tangental reference to OP
Silly aside refuting tangental reference
Authoritative statement confirming biased opinion
Personal experience validating authoritative statement
Pointless tautology contributing nothing to discussion
Warm homily showing no offense meant or taken
Wildly hilarious spoonerism as sig line
Baffled punctuation-free paragraph indicating poster’s complete ignorance of any and all issues concerned with OP.
Polite but irrelevant post outlining treatment of issue in (insert country name here).
Fervent post interpreting OP as evidence for poster’s own political beliefs / religious beliefs / personal tastes.
Worryingly precise post involving prolonged use of subscript and superscript.
Terse statement offering poster’s academic qualifications as proof for stating 2+2=5.
Slightly red-faced post indicating poster’s embarrassment at repeating points made previously and more eloquently in his/her haste to score points and appear to be more than a habitual MSPIMS offender.
Quote from OP:
Reminds another poster, via free association, of anecdote vaguely related to OP. Not a hijack, but a digression.
Following poster relates thoughts on previous poster’s anecdote and an unguided hijack is underway.
handy posts.
Genuine trolling.
Reference to genitalia size.
Supposition of family wealth.
Refutal of all prior posts, whether in accord with or contradictory to the current trolling subject matter.
Interest in hygeine, especially “down there”.
Lame accusatory insult. Empty promise to leave the board forever.
misspelled sig line
Comment which I happen to think is genuinely witty but unfortunately isn’t and only serves to make everyone uncomfortable. Half-hearted reference to a cult television show.
Shameless flirting and a marriage proposal by Shayna. Winking smilie.
{{{{{HUGS}}}}}
Shayna, dear, is this all just gratuitous flirting, or do you really want to marry all of us (boy, could we have a kick-ass reception)?
Post relating to the thread only vaugley, leaving readers unsettled and more sure that poster is not quite with us.
“Bump!”
Or words to that effect.
Completely unrelated comment intended to be posted in entirely different thread (misposted due to having multiple windows open).
Wally Sig
Saint Designation
Link to poster’s homepage
smiley smiley smiley smiley
Long explanation describing in depth how I was actually originally jesting.
Apology to any people offended by initial trolling event.
Submission that it wasn’t that bad anyway.
smiley smiley smiley (again)
Disclaimer regarding inoccuousness (is that a word??!!) of trolling post.
Random joke to ease tension.
Same stupid, misspelled sig line.
I am deliberately writing in a different format from all the other posters.
Lame apology.
Citation très sage d’un philosophe français.
- Philosophe français
Spanking Matt and trying to fit in.