Time magazine pranks Trump!

Yes, for certain values of “accidental.”

When you do complex high-end layouts like magazines and catalogs for a living, absolutely no detail escapes you (or your peers). You see details and relationships most people, even those generally artistically inclined, just don’t. Most designers, given the choice of bumping something one millimeter this way and missing a joke or two millimeters that way and making a visual… pun, joke, snark, quirk - will do the latter. And deny it with a straight face.

It also pays off when there are good reasons NOT to introduce any kind of potential insult into a layout, such as juxtapositions of ethnically, socially or politically sensitive components.

But I’ve only been doing this for about 30 years, so if any real experts want to correct me, please do.

Who is the “minority-President-elect”? Is that JugearS Obama?

No, that would be the President-elect who lost the popular vote and is fond of Twitter.

This thread reminds me of that poster who is convinced Bell Labs is a Satanic conspiracy.

So Time graphic designers definitely have something against Popes. And Bono.

Really? The horns? That’s disappointing.

I thought you were referring to the giant penis on the back of his chair.

Humor modules can be found on aisle 3, in the back, under clues.

Ditto. My second thought was that my cat had got his claws in it.

If that’s supposed to be devil’s horns then they did a really shit job. Looks more like Felix the Cat to me.

I think many people are projecting and seeing horns because they *want *this to be intentional.

I know lots of nerds, even more nerds than violent people. I wouldn’t say playing the “Hey, look at this picture! See the funny thing? See it yet? I’m not gonna tell you until you see it!” game is any way a common attribute among them.

Oh, come on. You’ve been around here almost as long as I have, and it’s not at all uncommon to post a “discovery” like this, with an OP followup after the first round of posts. If the collective attention span is only long enough to click a spoiler link, I’ll try to keep that… oh, look, giraffes!

How’re they wearing their neckties

Back of the chair?

I see a big dick in the chair.

I don’t know what the hell kind of devil you’ve been worshiping if you think they look like horns.

They are clearly cat ears. And for quite a grumpy cat at that.

Of course it’s common on this board. And every time I see one, I think “Oh Christ, another annoying pseudo-clever post”. You claim it’s more “fun” for people to figure out whatever nonsense you’re reading into a picture by themselves. I believe the majority of the population disagrees. And at least in person, after looking at whatever stupid picture said annoyer is showing you, you can ask them what the hell they’re talking about. On a messageboard you’ve got to wait until they deign to return and tell you.

So I don’t think it’s nerd shaming. At best, it’s “insufferably arrogant and annoying behavior shaming”, which, not unexpectedly, I think we need more of.

Here’s an interesting article on the cover portrait.

Why Trump’s Cover Portrait Is a Subversive Work of Political Art

The “prank” has nothing to do with the supposed “horns.” It’s much deeper and more subtle than that.

Excellent analysis. The use of the Louis XV chair was an inspired choice - this from Wikipedia’s page on Louis XV:

Now that’s the sort of analysis I can believe. Not some Beavis and Butthead-level “huh huh, huh huh… we put horns on 'im” bullshit.

It may be accidental, but fuck, now I can’t unsee it.