I think it came out in the right range (I’m not going to go running around looking for a ruler now. And my daughter’s awake. ) I’m not surprised that correlation coefficients can be found between body parts – heck, I’ve used such correlation coefficients (using dimensions of three other body parts) when did my work on the physics of karate. I’m just amazed that they work with such rough estimates as this site uses. I’d’a thought the error bars would come out bigger.
Anybody else try this one out?
Sweet, they estimated me about 2 inches too big. This will be my new pickup line.
“Hey Baby, the internet says my dork is 8.3 inches long. So, howabout it?”
Between that and Colt 45 Malt Liqour, I may never spend another night alone.
It estimates about 2 inches too short on me. But I’m not so sure about the size of my other appendages; perhaps I estimated wrong.
I thought I did read somewhere recently (an article linked on FARK maybe) that it had been disproven that there’s any correlation between the wang and other part sizes.
Well I’m disappointed, since it gave a teeny weeny size for me, yet I have a HUGE COCK.
I have small hands (all the better to grasp my HUGE COCK with and shake it all over the place), a proportionate nose, and small feet. Yet I have this HUGE COCK (that I have to carry round in a wheelbarrow).
Well damn. Turns out the website was right after all: I was measuring in centimetres when I though I was measuring inches. And it seems the wheelbarrow was from my nephew’s GI Joe set. :mad:
