< !doctype html public “-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en”>
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv=“Content-Type” content=“text/html; charset=iso-8859-1”>
<meta name=“description” content=“The Straight Dope: What is “toejam,” as in “toejam football”?”>
<meta name=“GENERATOR” content=“Mozilla/4.61 [en] (Win95; I) [Netscape]”>
<meta name=“keywords” content=“sdlang”>
<title>The Straight Dope: What is “toejam,” as in “toejam football”?</title>
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF" link="#0000FF" vlink="#006600" alink="#FFFF00">
<hr>
This is from The Straight Dope of 30 June 1989
<hr>< !–
<img src="" alt="" align=“right” WIDTH="" HEIGHT=""></p>–> Dear Cecil: What the hell is toejam, anyway? --Goofy Gholson, west suburbs, Chicago
Dear Goofy:
The grotty stuff that collects between your toes, of course. A “toejam
football” is the disgusting ellipsoid that forms when you rub it with your
finger. What Freudian significance it had for the Beatles (cf “Come Together”)
I’d just as soon not know.
–CECIL ADAMS<font size=+1></font>
<hr>
No way Cecil really wrote this. Surely the Great One would realize
that to the Beatles, a “toejam football” would be a disgusting spheroid.
Perhaps he had Aerosmith’s version in mind. --Patron1@aol.com
From a 1946 Funk & Wagnalls sitting on a nearby shelf:
ellipsoid, n. Geom. A solid every plane section of which is an ellipse or a circle.
spheroid, n. A body having nearly the form of a sphere.
A football, or a football-shaped roll of toejam, would not be an ellipsoid, because it’s pointy on the ends. However, “spheroid” is not an accurate description either, as these little rolled-up bits of gook can hardly be said to have “nearly the form of a sphere.”
Er, no doubt the poster was referring to the fact that in England, from whence the Fab Four hail, they refer to soccer as “football.”
I don’t like it any better than you, of course, long having been pre-disposed to mistrust the Brits, and finding their usage here contrary to all logic and justice and decency.
Of course, Cecil must be granted poetic license when addressing his mainly Yank Teeming Millions …
Way to zing him. Did it take 10 years to formulate that reply? I have no real opinion on toejam, I’m just confused by the dates of these posts. Did you really wait TEN years before replying to tracer? (who incidentally hasn’t posted in over a year himself, but give him another 8 or 9 years…)
Normally we don’t object to resurrecting old threads in this forum provided something substantive is added. I see nothing substantive here, so I’ll go ahead and close this thread.