Some cites, because no one wants to read through that bullshit.
In this post, he says I was sending “mixed signals.” Because in his mind, no matter what a woman says, and how clear it is she isn’t interested, extending a courtesy = a signal of wanting your cock. He knows this because he watches shitty sitcoms! Cite:
Bonus points for taking every joke from a sitcom literally and basing his interactions with other people in non-scripted real life of it. But wait, it gets stupider!
Troppus (and others) very patiently explain to him that being nice to someone isn’t a green light to try to force your paws on her, he still insists that there were “mixed signals” bit. No. Showing zero signs of interest and flat out explaining that the one thing that might look like one is not in painfully clear detail isn’t “mixed signals.” That’s inventing signals in your head because you want one. In his crazy mind, if you’re nice to someone, even if you’re rejecting him, those are “mixed signals.”
But this, this bullshit right here, is my favorite. He actually said, straight up:
Explicit prohibition on sex = she wants to fool around a bit. !!! WTF?