You don’t even have to go anywhere to get educated, that machine right in front of you can educate the living shit out of you! Hell, don’t even have to go to Baylor! Most likely, be better if you don’t!
But that doesn’t mean I’m morally superior to all the millions who voted against Obama.
It just means I preferred Obama as President.
I don’t know about that. Baylor College of Medicine is well known in the Texas Medical Center in Houston. Getting educated is one thing, being exposed to propaganda, is quite another thing.
Whether it’s Fox News, MSNBC,Salon or Huffington Post, it’s all presented with a spin.
The age of Walter Cronkite is, sadly, over.
And I bet you were a member of the “Democrat” Party, too!
Pull the other one, Uncle Waco. :dubious:
It seems both Larry Flynt (Hustler Magazine) and Howard Stern have come out condemning Trumps treatment and attitudes toward women. I feel like I’m on Bizarro World.
I don’t think they’ve ever advocated or bragged about non-consensual behavior.
Besides this being a nut pick, AFAIK both Flint and Stern are not known for being predators or forcing themselves over women. Of course it is much harder for Flynt.
Obama wasn’t running against Trump; Hillary is. I think it’s fine to feel morally superior this time.
In what year?
Ha! Zing! Voter fraud burn!
That a very fortuitous typo there. 
This works on so many levels
That’s just not how he rolls.
Not a typo:
The only error was that the auto correct separated the word and I left it like that.
Larry Flynt was accused by his daughter of sexually abusing her as a child. He also did hire underage strippers to work in his clubs.
And it remains a moot point today; really, that he was reprehensible or not is just a red herring. Trump is the issue and of course it is better for you to point at nuts that are not representative of many Democrats.
You were the one who stated, without checking, that Flynt wasn’t a predator. I merely tried to correct your ignorance. It seems you enjoy that state so I will Leave you in it from now on.
Nope, I’m glad to know more, but it should had been in a different thread, not in one where it is clear that you are only willing to tap dance around the matter at hand.
Please explain why when it has been shown that Trump is a bigot, a racist, a xenophobe, and a sexist that you or other conservatives are still voting for him.
Looks more like a post hoc ergo propter hoc argument to me.
Post: after. After hoc. Ergo: therefore. After hoc, therefore something else hoc.
Simple.
Thank you.
Next.