Okay, so in this CS thread I was smacked for bringing up Trans-Siberian Orchestra’s peculiarly lackluster concerts, and while I don’t think I was threadshitting, I will concede that an RIP thread is not the place to debate musical merit. But then similar comments were made, so as requested, I’m taking this to the Pit even though it’s not really Pit material.
Like most, I like much of TSO’s album work and bought on of the ten zillion copies of “Lost Christmas” sold after the “Christmas House” video went uber-viral. I don’t think they make music for the ages, but it’s very pumped and listenable.
So my comment was that the concert I saw had absolute truckloads of expensive stagecraft and lighting and sound systems, and a whole passel of brightly dressed musicians leaping and playing and singing… and it was the most soul-less, heart-less two hours of performance I’ve ever endured. It may as well have been robots playing at Disneyland.
Someone further on in the thread noted that a TV special seemed much the same - “cheesy” was the word. And then someone mentioned what I already knew, that there isn’t really a “Trans-Siberian Orchestra” any more than there is a “Hamilton” adminstration - the concerts are by touring companies, two or more of them, with essentially nameless performers (emphasis on the word) following an elaborate choreographed script and score.
So whatever the brilliance of founder/composer Paul O’Neill, doesn’t it devalue the worth of this “group” to have it be composed of… actors? Even very good, musically talented actors? Who are mostly so nameless that most fans couldn’t name one without googling or looking at a CD insert?
Even Alan Parsons never pretended to be anything but the ultimate session arranger, and toured very selectively with the very best session musicians he could call.
So TSO: real music, I guess, and not bad… but utterly fake performances, live and on TV? What’s the point?