Obviously I’m not psychic, but it seems to me that you’re confused between “mindreader” and “reader.” When I read someone’s words describing their intent and infer an intent from those words, that’s just basic literacy, that’s not mindreading. And if I say your inference is wrong, that’s slightly more advanced literacy.
I may confidently say that Tubadiva was not promising catsix a batch of double-stuff Oreos. I am equally confident saying that she was not promising her physical harm. Neither conclusion requires reading minds–just reading words.
Actually, while you do make a good point in that it isn’t as extreme as mindreading, it’s not so simple as just “reading”, either. For you to have got that from plain reading the comment would have had to have been something like this;
What you’re doing is reading between the lines, based on a) your personal history and experience of Tuba, and b) your own assumptions of what she would/wouldn’t say. As you say, you’re taking an inference - but the very nature of an inference is that it is not spelt out in plain language. There’s room for many inferences, some which may be totally contradictory.
I don’t agree with your proposition as surely as you do - although i’m attempting to keep an open mind, and I certainly believe it’s a possibility - but to describe your inference from what Tuba said as a case of “just reading words” is false.
Well since asking logical, fact based questions only gets me falsely accused of being a liar and being told that there are “promises” that certain people would like to make me, I thought maybe you all were using reverse psychology.
Seriously though, this is the Pit, and I thought Left Hand of Dorkness richly deserved that for his whining about a couple of throwaway colloquialisms used by the former Greathouse.
My opnion of that is that someone in that scenario is a lot like the kid who whines to teacher that somebody called him a butthead on the playground.