And yet, he’s still a hell of a lot smarter than you’ll ever be.
Something tells me that you’re just “playing dumb” again. I notice your command of English is still holding, by the way.
I do not think that you said, anywhere, that you were wrong about Abu Graib. I do not think that you can provide a cite proving that you said that. Something suggests that you’re lying. I wonder what that could be…
In any case, I’m not about to be played by your little ‘game’. It’s a rather odious tactic to be, as you’ve admitted already, you are inflammatory and provocative, and as you’ve shown, you do this by pretending to be dumb.
Blah, I’m not doing real well with my textual quality in this thread. you can cut the “you are” out of the last sentence. But I’m still not going to be hooked by your tactics let alone led on a merry chase.
So, you want me to be wrong?
No, I never said I was wrong. I said I wished it never happened, and I apologized for offending people with unheeded expression of my thoughts. But I was never wrong.
You see, the simple problem is, we are talking at cross purposes. You hate Bush and don’t care about Saddam. I hate Saddam and don’t care about Bush. It’s as simple as that. But it makes it practically impossible for us to understand each other, especially for you.
You keep calling me Bush defender. I know nothing about Bush, I don’t care about his policies, I never expressed an opinion at any threads dealing with any political issues except the war. I don’t care. Moreover, just before the election I came to conclusion that Kerry will do all right as a Prez; I promised to support Hillary in '08; I defended the French at every opportunity; I was always sympathetic to Moslems in general; I did many other things most Republicans find unthinkable. I am not a Republican.
I only know one thing for sure: Bush is doing the only thing possible under the circumstances. Not because he’s special, but because there’s no options but to do what he does. Gore would be doing the same thing, and Kerry, and Bill, and Hillary; and you would be doing the same thing were you in the White House. May be a little neater or a lot messier, but exactly the same thing.
Raises hand in back of class.
What about those of us who have or had no use for either of them? I’ve said all along that even though I was against the invasion of Iraq for various reasons, Saddam was an evil creep who really needed to go. On the other hand, I really enjoy bashing Bush too, for many reasons. Are we allowed to hate only one guy? Am I being greedy?
I forgot. Yer wrong. 
No hating both Saddam and Bush (or his puppet-master Cheney) is a natural fit. This is showing a hatred for leaders with despotic tendencies.
Jim
That would be extremely interesting and gratifying to observe. So far, there’s no precedent.
WTF?? What does this mean? There are plenty of people who dislike Bush, dislike Hussein and were against the invasion of Iraq, just see any one of the many debates or pit threads on the subject.
Or did you mean you being wrong? It that case I think it is one of the few valid cases of your post being your cite.
Lip service. Give me the good old-fashioned hate-speech.
Remember to use cites.
Jesus H. Motherfucking Christ on a bicycle, you’re an ass. Are you honestly saying that you do not believe without a specific cite that there are those who are opposed to both Bush and Hussein?
Fuck you, and your oh-so-cute pretense of poor English skills. You’re not an idiot, you’re something far worse.
Yes, I’d like to see at least few cites where verbal abused heaped upon Saddam even begins to compare with verbal abuse heaped upon Bush on a regular basis.
What on Earth does that have to do with anything? Let’s compare the number of pit threads about liberal media bias, and pit threads about Adolf Hitler. Clearly, conservatives think CNN is worse than Hitler!
I know, isn’t he just darling?
Now I’m accused of faked bad English.
That just takes the cake!
I never said my English was good or bad. You decided to make a big show about that! Now it’s my fault! Words fail me…
Add faux outrage to faux English problems.
Equals Faux News?
Naw, that equation is a bit more intricate.
I know you will use it against me in a heartbeat, but here it is:
My English is not so good. Actually it’s quite erratic.
Normally, I’m lazy and let it slide. When people yell at me I try to shape up. That’s all.
OK, here’s some hate speech. Bush r teh sux0r. Bush r teh lame.
For Saddam, Saddam r teh sux0r. Saddam r teh lame. All your “enduring” base are belong to us.
Either you didn’t bother to read any threads or posts, or you are just wrong again. Wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong.
Your grasp of English is actually pretty good. Unfortunately, your grasp of reality is woefully nonexistent. Here’s a clue. Before you make WRONG claims, do a little bit of research into ummmm, the news (not just from Fox or Rush or Coulter or Freeper either), and read some of the related threads on the Dop that already exist. Or barring that little bit of effort, just take time to read whatever thread you are spewing in, at that particular moment. But, whatever you say will still be wrong. I have the utmost confidence in that.