So, you can’t respond to my request and you can’t stop lying.
I’d have to start lying in order to stop lying, sugarpie.
Old Pustule:
I request for a second time now a link to the apology you claim to have made for the “unhealthy desires” you demonstrated in the thread about Abu Ghraib.
“Er… umm no hable ingles.”
D’oh!
That’ll teach me to attempt a witty response in a language I don’t speak.
Or Spanish, by the looks of it.
Ha-hah!
Beat ya to it!
It’s buried deep within my heart.
What a truly pathetic asshole you are.
So, um… are you making up the fact that you apologized, or not?
Which reminds me, I forgot to give you a translation:
Although in French original it sounds much better.
And that reminds me, got a cite for your alleged apology?
Running a search under your user name for “apologize” and “torture” yields zero hits.
Running a search under your user name for “wrong” and “torture” yields zero hits.
Running a search under your user name for “incorrect” and “torture” yields zero hits.
Running a search under your user name for “mistaken” and “torture” yields zero hits.
Care to offer up a cite?
This is better then virtual sex!
Although not as good as the real thing… Which reminds me…
So, you gain some sort of sexual satisfaction from tossing out claims and having people react to them?
I’ll ask again, where’s the cite for your alleged apology?
Because right now it looks like you’re lying.
Okay, for those of you keeping score at home, please allow me to summarize.
Post 1: FinnAgain starts a thread recommending Old Pustule as one of the two most idiotic posters currently active at the SDMB (no small honor, given that our community currently numbers almost 56 thousand members).
Post 115: I post a link to something Old Pus wrote about a year ago, in which he demonstrated an unusually profound level of both stupidity and moral turpitude, to justify my vote for him, specifically, as the single most moronic poster currently active on this board.
Post 122: Amid the invective, Old Pus claims to have regretted, and even apologized for, his “unhealthy desire” to attach electrodes to the privates of Iraqi detainees. He fakes mock dismay over the fact that I had not realized the depth of his remorse. He knows, when he submits this post, that he is lying, and that he has in fact never apologized for his performance in that thread.
Post 150: I concede I was unaware that he had evinced remorse for the utterly execrable opinions he had previously expressed, or apologized for them. I ask him to provide a link to the apology, so that I might evaluate its weight and sincerity.
Posts 153, 155, 158, and 161: Old Pus continues with his usual diarrheic posting style, studiously avoiding my request. In the last post (161), fully aware that he has himself already lied in this thread, he accuses FinnAgain of lying, when he (Finn) clearly has not.
Post 163: I repeat my request for a link to the apology Pus claims to have issued.
Post 168: Pus concedes that he doesn’t actually have a cite, and this therefore makes me a “pathetic asshole.”
First off, Pus, I hope you realize (although I suspect you don’t) that at this point, the only person who comes off as a pathetic asshole in this exchange is you.
Secondly, I would like to submit the exchange above as my second piece of evidence that Pus really is a very special sort of idiot, the kind you don’t come across every day. After all, he tells a bald-faced, easily traceable lie and within the space of 40 posts has gone on to accuse someone else of lying. This kind of behavior is more than just a little stupid; it’s a very special kind stupid. Monumental stupidity, perhaps.
There’s this great Swedish put-down, one that begs for a decent translation but unfortunately does not yield to English: intelligence befriad, they say, when something is “entirely free of any semblance of intelligent thought.” Liberated, as it were, from the constraints of intelligence.
You, dear Pus, are the personification of that phrase. Soldier on! You’ve long since liberated yourself from the constraints of anything resembling intelligent discourse.
And after your performance in this thread, you’ve definitely got my vote.
OK, idiot Svintus, I’ll explain one more time.
What you should have done was to ask, “Esteemed NI, do you still stand by those statements you made 2 years ago, and if so, why?” Depending on my answer you could proceed to treat me accordingly. Simple, isn’t it?
And yes, I did have a change of mind.
What about you, most devoted Saddam’s butt polisher?
Please. It was late and I was watching James Bond movies and drinking vodka martinis… suffice it to say, this morning I respected myself a liittle less then usual… sapienti sat.
There is a post in which I said that I wish Abu Ghraib never happened, but I can’t find it.
I wonder why that might be.
Can’t recall the thread, but here’s another one.
Nope, doesn’t cut it.
Whaddya mean, “doesn’t cut it”?! It’s practically “la indulgencia”, remission of temporal punishment for all sins!