I wasn’t sure where to put this, but it’s art, so…
I guess they think that Jesus shouldn’t look like a “pretty boy”? I don’t think if he existed, he looked much like this, anyway. But clearly, people are afraid this picture might make them have new and uncomfortable thoughts. Me, I’m envious that the Son of God is so (Cross)fit.
Haven’t Jesus statues mostly be gay porn of the ages? Totally ripped. Isn’t the normal subtext is that he’s suffering and dying, so that makes the gay bit ok?
An ancient belief is that Jesus was not especially attractive, based on the prophecy in Isaiah 53:2:
Writing in the third century, the church father Origen seems to have thought that Jesus was ugly. He writes that Isaiah prophesied that Jesus would arrive “not in comeliness of form, nor in any surpassing beauty.” Origen, like the second century authors Justin Martyr and Irenaeus, were using Isaiah 53:2-3 which predicted that the Messiah would be unattractive so that people not “desire him.” In other words, he was a bit funny-looking because an attractive Messiah might be distracting to his followers. Other Christian writers like Clement of Alexandria gave, Walsh said, “the ancient equivalent of ‘he’s got a great personality’” argument.
Scripture describes Jesus as “both God and man”, so it is safe to assume he had all the plumbing and all the natural desires that come with being human. I have no problem with it.
I was going to say-- eh, not impressed with the undefined abs on ‘Sexualized Jesus’. I’ve seen ‘Jesus on the cross’ statues in any number of Catholic churches that had much more well-defined abs than that.