It makes the Clinton fans squeal, it saved those ladies, it doesn’t look like the administration was engaging in talks with a “rogue nation”. I’d say this is good for everyone. Except the republicans, of course.
So Clinton’s 62. Figure he’s got ~20 years left in him. Any chance he’ll end up in the same boat as Carter with the somewhat derisive desciptor “Excellent former President” ?
I’m waiting for the inevitable spin by Republicans, either dismissing the success as unimportant, or decrying the act as a show of America’s weakness. After all, a self respecting and strong nation doesn’t talk to North Korea, it bombs them off the face of the Earth. That’ll learn 'em.
Seriously, I consider this a feather in the cap of democratic diplomacy we may reap dividends from for at least the near future.
The White House was very quick to distance themselves from Clinton’s trip by insisting that it was a “private mission”. They should derive no benefit from it. They should not be chastised for it either. Bolton should shut up.
This is why Bill Clinton was such a good president. It appears he basically sat down, and with the face of a sincere apologetic person uttered pure bullshit about how sorry he was they broke NK law and how amazingly good of Il it would be to them go. Journalists returned, without a single bullet. Genius.
And you’re taking that at face value? You think Bill Clinton just hopped on a jet and went to North freaking Korea to negotiate for hostages without talking to, say, the State Department lead by his wife? Or the president? Come on.
We don’t know what, if anything, Clinton might have said or offered to get these women freed. But that said, it’s hard to see a downside for anybody here. Bolton aside, most Republicans are going to be happy Ling and Lee are coming home. The situation got resolved and the administration handled it properly as far as I can tell.
One hopes so; we don’t really have any other former Presidents with the health and stamina for this sort of mission (assuming the objective is to resolve rather than exacerbate a crisis).
Yes, looks like Obama is behaving like a grown-up for a change. Of course it was a private mission that Clinton never told the White House about (even through his wife) and of course being private, Kim Jong-Il was just so impressed by Bill’s charisma that he gave in immediately
This is what diplomacy is all about, getting what you want in a way to make the other side feel good about themself and more inclined to deal with you in future instead of screaming contest.
Imagine Bush’s reaction. He might have left them to rot, or organised some massive raid endangering any number of lives, the first being the people he was using to boost his own struttismo.
“Hillary is the Secretary of State, she’s supposed to take care of it. I can’t believe how worthless she is at her job, having to send in her husband to take care of something for her.”
That’s too bad, because “liar” is pretty much the job description. But this isn’t about Robert Gibbs anyhow, it’s just a question of common sense. The idea that Clinton went over there without anybody’s approval and without some careful coordination is absurd. A little analysis from the New York Times:
Elsewhere they comment that he probably wouldn’t have even gone to North Korea in the first place if they had not agreed in advance to release the women. These things are carefully choreographed and not done accidentally.
Well, considering that I don’t regard Carter as a particularly good ex-President, I think Clinton has him easily beat already. No derision from me. And this particular bit of diplomacy works just fine - no griping from me.
Well, in my opinion at least, there are two significant differences between them: Jimmy Carter is a much better person; Bill Clinton is a much better politician.
That said, Carter and Clinton have both taken full advantage of their fame to accomplish their particular goals, and both have done so very effectively.