Ah, good, the trip is over.
Can we get back to rational discussion now? For those who are here on Earth with me, let’s go back to VCO3’s very late list of offenses:
We already heard about the weed smoke. As for thumping rap music, lots of people do that, and most of them aren’t thugs. Hell, there have been times in my life when you could have walked into my apartment and been nearly suffocated by the weed smoke and, yes, there would be thumping rap music playing. I’m no thug.
Translation: “They’re loud black people, so they must be thugs.” We heard this one. Apparently, this is more offensive and thuggish than,
because it was offered as the sole explanation in the original thread as to why VCO3 was intimidated by them. No, nevermind, he said he didn’t want to talk to them because they were smoking weed, as well…and then told us that he was a card-carrying member of NORML. Somehow, I’m thinking that doesn’t add up.
This sounds much more offensive than any of the above, yet VCO3 didn’t mention it in the original thread as evidence for why he doesn’t want to talk to them. Does that make any more sense to any of you guys than it does to me? If so, can someone explain it to me?
Again, it’s quite common among rap fans (he’s referring to rap “artist” 50 Cent, for those who don’t know) to emulate their favorite musical acts in clothing style. For evidence of thuggishness, this one’s a loser.
Well, OK. That’s a good point showing that they’re bad roommates. But dangerous roommates? I dunno. Anyway, why wasn’t this mentioned originally? Again, this sounds like it should be more offensive than a little weed smoke to a member of NORML.
I’ve hardly seen more nutso drivers than in my short stay in Chicago. I bet they’re not his only neighbors who drive shitty cars and double-park them, and if they are, that hardly sounds intimidating. Anyway, wouldn’t real criminals rake in enough dough from their exploits to fix up their car every once in a while?
I’m completely baffled as to what significance this has, now that I know it has nothing to do with dog training. Somebody mentioned above that a lot of black people and stereotypical black characters in black comedies raise a lot of pigeons, but I guess I haven’t noticed that. I’ve known lots and lots of black people across all socioeconomic levels, starting from my early childhood in an upper-middle-class black neighborhood (the wealthiest predominantly black county in America, actually, IIRC) and continuing through all kinds of other experiences I don’t see fit to list. Anyway, unless it violates some no-pets clause in that complex, I don’t see how the fact that they raise pigeons (?) should be intimidating. If it does violate such a rule, what sensible neighbor wouldn’t call the landlord and let them know?