Beats me, elelle. My guess would be that their beliefs probably are flaky. Plants probably don’t have anything like consciousness as we know it.
I do know though that if some plant were going to come walking up to me and hack a part of my body off, I wouldn’t care one wit whether it was respectful or not. I’d prefer to keep my body parts.
I think the atittude is right.
I think an ethical human being must recognize the value of the world he’s in and of all things in it. Conspicuous waste is always bad, and one must judge the consequences of their actions.
One who kills needlessly or wantonly risks not only the plants and animals suffering, but more importantly the degradation of themselves.
I just don’t judge all plants to be inferior to all animals. I think a dead life is a dead life, regardless. If you chop down a tree to get a toothpick you’ve done a bad thing, just as if you kill any living thing without need, or waste a nonliving thing as well.
When I collect firewood for the winter, I prop of dead trees so they’ll season or cut off dead limbs first. The year I hit a deer with my car, I didn’t bother hunting because I already had all the deer meat I could eat.
I try not to be wasteful, but I recognize my life causes suffering and death to other creatures. This is an unavoidable consequence, and, it’s not necessarily a bad thing. Ultimately I will suffer and die, and become worm’s meat. The molecules of me have been other living things countless times in the past and will be again in the future.
What kind of fool hypocrite measures the value of death, or dares to measure the value of a life. We are unwilling participants in the passion play of nature. Life and death is inevitable and we’re a part of it.
The idea of not eating meat because you don’t want to participate in the suffering of animals is to me a cosmically stupid standpoint.
You are involved in life and death and suffering. Inextricably. By simple existance it is so.
It seems to me that the people who try not to participate are missing the whole friggin’ point of existence.
You are a participant in suffering and death. You can be a participant and grow from the experience and be a good compassionate person, or you can choose to ignore it’s fact, and substitute artificial and invalid standards to make yourself feel good. They’re just not real though.
They just aren’t.
Many people have a Victorian atittude towards death. It’s prudish and foolish.
It’s inevitable. So’s suffering.
So let’s say you’re a vegetarian. You’re hungry. All that’s available is a hamburger. It came from a steer that was slaughtered, and suffered some in the process and in it’s short life.
Let’s say your a moral objector to meat. so you don’t eat the burger and it gets thrown away. That part of the steer’s suffering represented by the burger has been wasted, and you’ve gone hungry.
I would say you’ve behaved foolishly and disrespectfully. Better you had stepped up to your natural part in the order of things and eaten the burger. The steer’s death and suffering brought you and others succor. It wasn’t all a bad thing.
But, if you waste it, you throw away the opportunity to make the most of that inevitable death, and something else must die to feed you.
Either you starve or you participate in the death of things of value, plant and animal.
Every motion of your life causes pain and death and suffering to beings. It is foolish to try and stop this natural order of things, or even partially or symbolically deny it.
The real wrong is to waste your life on such foolish ideas, to not do something worthwhile with the life that has been given to you at such great cost.