[QUOTE=Uzi]
That is the OP’s recipe. I just emphasized the ‘equal parts’ bit.
[/QUOTE]
I thought it was my recipe and the OP hadn’t posted one (though mine is pretty much identical to the one linked to from the Food Network).
[QUOTE=Do Not Taunt]
Because I’m making something specifically for them.
[/QUOTE]
While this is true in some cases, it isn’t true in the OP. There is nothing about a non-meat dish that makes it specifically for the vegetarian. I’ll cook lemon linguini for meat eaters and veggies alike - there is no requirement that a meat eater be served meat with every meal.
What I have been thinking about is when one should only do a vegetarian entree. With 11 guests as in the OP, one of whom is vegetarian, I see no problem with the balance struck, and the meal sounds very tasty. On the other hand, if I were to invite a vegetarian date over to my place for a home cooked meal, I would think it very odd to make two entrees, one with meat, one without (unless I was grilling, when I don’t think it would be an issue). And that isn’t just because of the work involved in cooking two entrees rather than one. I would see it as being rather rude to my guest to cook something different in that situation.
If it was myself and a fellow meat eater inviting a vegetarian couple round for a dinner, I think the same would stand - I would probably cook just vegetarian, and feel somewhat rude if I did meat and vegetarian.
However, if it is me and two couples that I have invited, I think I would quite possibly do the two entree route and not find it rude.
If the situation were reversed fro the OP, and I (a meat eater) invited 11 vegetarians to dinner, I would think it very rude of me to cook a steak for myself, even if I knew that none of the 11 were “ethical” vegetarians. However, if I knew there were 10 vegetarian invitees, and one who was not only not vegetarian, but did not eat vegetarian food at all (I am looking at you, ex-F-i-L), I would probably get a steak or something for them separately.