I meant more in terms of legals (and probably only skilled legals at that, if we’re talking practically) and U.S. citizens.
It is amazing, since i’m not actually disagreeing with you on that - I think your Liberalism Run Amuck detector may have failed on this once. This is why I think this as a solution would only bring trouble; discounting illegal immigrants, this policy will only affect legal ones. And if you’re asking legal immigrants to pay more to get into the country, it just seems likely to me that a lot of them are going to come in illegally instead - that it would actually hurt matters rather than helping them.
No, that was my point. Subsidies generally aren’t all that popular, though, and we’re talking a good many individual and perhaps even courses of shots before workers would even get to working. Which means yet more paperwork.
I don’t think, for the downsides, you’d get enough of an aid for it to be worth it. And that’s presuming that it would help at all.