Just my $0.02 on why Pam Anderson isn’t sexy anymore. For me, it’s the whole “dirty slut” look she’s going for. When she first hit the scene with Playboy, I saw her video. All I can say is that she was the most beautiful woman I had ever seen. Sure, the bod was nice, but all those women have great bods.
What separated her from the Playboy pack was her smile, she had a smile that would light up a room. Everybody looks at me funny when I say that. She absolutely had the pretty girl next door, you went to high school with her look. Just the most adorable features, and now she’s gone and screwed it all up to look like a pouty, heavy black eyeliner, bleach blonde, slutty whore, blech!
Sexy: the girl next door
Not sexy: the slutty whore
Sexy (on guys):
*plain gold band–just one–on a nice strong hand
*hair that doesn’t look like it takes longer to fix than mine does (so that would be…oh, 2 minutes)
*watches! MMMMM, how I love a nice outdoorsy-looking watch!
NOT SEXY:
*kitchen or bathroom sex. Living room, sure. Closet, okay. But any part of the house that I have to scrub with Comet, no thanks.
*Ditto for washing machine- or dryer-sex. They just make me sleepy with all that rocking.
*someone copping a feel while I’m doing mundane chores like washing dishes
*someone licking this spot right here on my… um…sternum. Right above my heart. ::shudder:: (That’s weird, huh? At least according to all the sex scenes in movies, it is.)
Maybe I missed it but did anyone mention shaped eyebrows? I mean did you ever see a chick with those thin, just fake looking eyebrows? Its like they shaved off the top half of their eyebrows. What is that?
Tall guys. I find it ironic that so many younger men worry about their height. Me, I’m pretty short (5’3") so to me a guy 5’8" or taller is fairly tall. Much over six feet tall I’d have to stand on my tippy toes to…see him. yeah, that’s it, see him eye to eye.
I’ll throw in a “ditto” to overly muscled men, too. Normal muscles are wonderful, so much muscle that veins pop out is not. I really really hate seeing veins (I’m afraid of how my hands will look when I’m old) so it’s a total turn off to see that sort of thing. And I’m not a fan of a lot of chest hair, either, though I’d never suggest a guy shave it off (how freaky and controling that’d be of me.)
Acquiescence. It’s nice once in a while for someone to go with the flow, but I don’t want to be the damn leader. I can’t be the only one with ideas/goals for things to get done, or I end up getting mad for at the person for bearing the burden of coming up with ways to get asses off couches. Besides, I like to argue, and people who are complicent don’t argue much.
May I also add, that in general, men in tighty whities…ewww…
Also, it is supposed to be sexy when men wear cologne, I don’t mind it too much, but prefer more natural man smell, not BO mind you, but…
Also, I must admit, it’s supposed to be sexy when men wear their pants falling off (I am NOT in the generation that thinks so, btw)…I just want to go up and offer to pull their pants up for them and give them a good black or brown belt!
I like muscles too, I just like real looking ones. To me, a construction worker is sexy, a bodybuilder just grosses me out. Even the chubby guys who lift the huge weights in the Olympics look better to me than, say, the guys on the covers of romance novels.
I heard a joke awhile back about how you would never see Julia Roberts in the same room with Osama Bin Laden–had to take a second look and it was kindy scary (but funny).
The romance novel cover guys are really not all that appealing. I’ll second that. Too much facial symmetry is actually boring. Aidan Quinn over Brad Pitt any day.
Let A be your true personality. Assume A is in the norm of personality distributions P; it follows that some p must for every A= PSexy, otherwise, why are you here?
Let your à be your appearance and actions. If Ã<>P, ~S, and where Ã<>A is ~S by the VIPER proof. Therefore nerdy affectation by lumberjacks would be just as jarringly unsexy and lumberjacky affectation by nerds, although regional differences may persist.
If assumption A{P is untrue, all conditions imply ~S, (The Be Yourself Fallacy), it is recommended that you regress to the mean, and start over.
Wow elfkin477, I’m afraid it’s never going to work out between us. You see, I’m a tall hairy-chested muscular man, who will go along with just about anything to avoid an argument. :eek: