Just looking for an average waist to length ratio, if such a thing exists.
I’m asking because it took me 20 minutes to find a single pair of pants in my preferred size(room for shrinkage) today. I’m sure the fact that I was at Wal*Mart might have been a factor in my troulbe finding this size, but I dunno … they had 34x29.
First the jokes,
I have a 28" waist, but I buy the 44"s because they are a little more comfortable.
I have a 28" waist, I just keep it around my knees.
36x32 usually, but I’m only a few pounds away from 34 waist now.
This seems to be a very easy size to find. I never have trouble with it.
This was a good week – I actually had to buy a new belt because my current one was too big! (moved three holes since earlier this year and now it won’t go any smaller)
I wear 34 X 34s, and I’m 6’0" 170 pounds. I couldn’t imagine trying to fit into this size with 40 more pounds on. How do you sit down without pinching the jewels? I don’t think I could even walk crammed into my jeans that tightly.
I remember in basic training when we had to go get fitted for our blues. It was during a time of transition between an older style and a newer style. The older style was a slightly looser fit than the newer style. When I picked out a pair of pants my own size, the sadistic evil bastard doing the sizing made me get the next smallest size…which was uncomfortable…Then he made me get the next smallest size again…which was fit to bursting…but in the new style I couldn’t even sit down without major discomfort.
I have a long upper body and rather short legs. Honestly my inseam is in between 32 and 34 but I’d rather have too much than not enough. The extra room I get from the extra inseam seems to help my jewels, I guess. To be honest with you this size has really just always fit me so I hadn’t put much thought into why they do?
36X30. Was 34X30, before that 32X30. My weight is not that much different, but the fat seems to have fallen to my waist. Or maybe I had more muscle, which has since turned to fat.