I’m a political junkie, I don’t know which magazine or newspaper it was, but a relatively well-known paper ran a profile of sorts on Obama before his 2004 convention speech and prior to him being elected U.S. Senator. That was my only real exposure to him–at that point, I was less aware of him than I was of Cory Booker–who was involved in a real famous (to politics junkies) campaign for Mayor of Newark in 2002, and was seen as a rising black star in the party fighting against a very corrupt Newark Democratic political establishment that had long been entrenched. Obviously, Obama’s trajectory was far more ascendant than Bookers’ from then forward, but by most measures they both ended up doing relatively well for themselves in politics.
I’m a lifelong conservative and was a Republican until a point after the 2012 election–I voted against Obama twice.
What probably set me apart, and this is probably why me and the small minority of Republicans like me left the party–is I never hated Obama when I voted against him. I did not see him as a threat to the republic or my way of life, I saw him as a slightly more progressive Third Way Democrat, who was a tad naive and unexperienced in Washington politics and foreign relations. My antipathy towards him in '08 was mostly based on the fact that I found his mantra of “hope and change” to be empty drivel platitudes designed to make people feel good, I found some of his promises like banning lobbyists from the White House to be eye rolling to anyone who really understands how politics works. He was a mainstream Democrat, I wasn’t, so I disagreed with a number of his positions, and I found his campaign to be appealing to a simplistic and watered-down mentality in the electorate.
Now, one thing to note is Barack Obama is a million times the politician than I would ever be–he’s probably the best Democratic politician of the 21st century. The stuff I found to be banal platitudes…that’s actually what people wanted at that place and time, and while it may have been off-putting to people like me, I represented a minority of the voters, Obama understood what the majority wanted and that is how he structured his campaign.
Unlike a lot of partisans who 100% believe they will win until the election is over, I usually have a pretty realistic view on elections. I knew McCain was cooked very, very early in '08’s cycle, so I knew many months in advance we would have our first black President. While I disagreed with his style and policy positions, I had a lot of respect for Barack Obama the man and it did make me genuinely feel proud of my country that a lot of people who probably still harbored some element of racial resentment, put that aside to vote for him.
In 2012, I voted against him again, although for almost none of the made up and stupid controversies the Tea Party imbeciles promoted. My biggest issues with '12 Obama was I felt he was mismanaging American foreign policy, and I generally thought Romney had a better read on how to confront things like ISIS and Russia. He issued his “redline” proclamation in August of 2012 and then failed to do anything when Syria violated it. I was already starting to feel fairly alienated from the base of the party by 2012, though–if someone like Santorum had won the primary in '12 I likely would have voted for Obama in '12–as I did end up voting for Hillary in '16 (a politician I disliked a lot more than Obama.)
FWIW my take has kinda been in recent years that the country ‘wasted’ Obama’s talents by electing him in '08. He was the right man for the wrong time.
I actually think Hillary was better suited for the '08 era Presidency than Obama–and HRC would have beaten McCain. Hillary was probably better suited for the '08-16 era than Obama–it was an era of little ability to do much, but where what there was to be done was going to be done by administrative technocracy. I also think HRC is a little more willing to get in the mud and fight on things where Obama took the high road. HRC would have not had an amazingly impactful Presidency, but to be honest Obama’s Presidency was limited in impact because of the state of the country and the shift to pure Tea Party obstructionism after '10.
On the flipside I think Obama was the perfect antithesis to a Trump '16, if the '16 election had been Senator Obama vs Trump, I firmly believe Trump is never President and the country is on a better path–Obama’s skills in my opinion were much better suited for trying to douse the flames of irrational stupidity that have overtaken the country in these years than they were for maneuvering the State of play in the early 2010s.