I am very interested in philosophical arguments for various different important philosophical questions. Instead of relying on previously existing arguments, I as a loose-hobby make up my own. The following is a unique argument that I have reasoned myself. Please note that I am an amateur philosopher at best; therefore, please poke as many holes into this argument as possible. I never really had any of my ideas peer-reviewed. Thus, I truly want to learn how to be more reasonable in my philosophical arguments.
The argument is as follows:
- Fundamental truth is any idea that cannot be broken into simpler components.
- Fictitious things must always be ideas that can be broken into fundamental truths.
- The idea of God cannot be broken down further into more fundamental truths.
- Therefore, the idea of God must be true because the idea cannot be broken down into more of a fundamental truth.
Potential Counter Arguments:
Fundamental Truths Do Not Exist:
I define a fundamental truth as follows:
“A fundamental truth is any proposition that is the foundation of a chain of reasoning or system.”
Fundamental truth within the context of this argument therefore is applicable to any chain of reasoning that can be said to be founded on reason, regardless of the existence of objective truth.
Not All Fictitious Things Are Based In Fundamental Truths:
It is impossible to contemplate something that does not exist in reality, because, to contemplate it is to make it exist in reality. Thus, all things must at least have have some basis in reality.
For an example: Take a unicorn. The concept of a unicorn by itself is fictitious. However, each and every one of the elements that make up a unicorn are based on fundamental truths. Horse, for an example, is a fundamental truth that makes up the concept of a unicorn. As does horn, which is another fundamental truth that makes up the concept of a unicorn. Every element that makes up the Unicorn is based on fundamental truth.
Even abstract concepts like magic or being are things that rely upon fundamental truths well. For for the example of being, the concept is based on existence itself, which is a fundamental truth in regards to the idea of being. Or, in the case of magic, the the fundamental truths of fictitious magic could be assigned as existence or the effect fictional magic has on the world.
The Idea Of God Can be Broken Down Further, Thus, Making It Not A Fundamental Truth:
This might be true if one where to assign elements to God that religions do. However, for this argument specifically, the only attribute that is being assigned to God is omnipotence.
I’m really interested in what this community has to say about this argument. If there are any major flaws in this argument, or if something needs to be clarified, please ask me! I can’t wait to see how others react to my created arguments.