Prediction:
No response to this.
Or, if there is a response, it will be because I said “Prediction: No response to this.” and we will be able to detect it because it will deviate from his natural rhythm.
Now it’s possible Dio will surprise us and not only respond, but in a way that doesn’t appear to be trying to out-psychology us, it will sound like a sincere response. However, the pattern is set and this is actually going to be tougher than it looks.
Why should I respond to what are obviously facetious statements? What kind of response would you be looking for? You didn’t ask a question or make a substantive comment. “Nobody is attacking you hur hur” is not a statement that seeks a response.
Yes she did.
This is fun.
Scoring:
1 point for responding at all
1 point for a Dio-ish sounding response
0 points for the “natural rhythm” (this part is subjective, like synchronized swimming judging) because there was no response to numerous of my previous posts recently, but this one trapped you
I’m only one judge, the judges from France, Sweden, Japan, etc. may give you higher marks in that last category, not sure.
Try again:
Yes. Repeatedly. It’s getting old.
Here’s an idea: why not ignore the ones trying to poke you? Oh, right, then they’ll complain that you’re not responding. Can’t have that now, can you?
I do.
You do what?
I think he and Lute just got married.
That’s probably a good idea.
If I was so stupid that I thought all Arabs were Muslims and that all Arabic institutions are Islamic instutuions, I’d keep my mouth shut as well.
I suppose it’s possible you’re a bigot as well as being stupid, but I’ll give you the benefit of the doubt.
I’ve never said or thought either one of these things. You’re confusing me with someone else.
Ibn Warraq didn’t say you said or thought either one of those things, did he/she?
Note: for all 2 people following this, I’ve added the question at the end because that was one of the reasons Dio wouldn’t respond to my posts, “no substantive comment or ask a question”. Let’s see if Dio is true to his word.
No, you’ve never said it, but you clearly thought it.
You described two Muslims as “Islamophobic douchebags” because they mentioned that Al Jazeera as a matter of policy referred to Palestinian suicide bombers during the Intifada.
Now leaving aside the idiocy of condeming two men who actually like Al Jazeera, such a comment is utterly moronic since Al Jazeera is hardly a Muslim organization. In fact, as those two men have noted a substantial number of Al Jazeeras reporters and editors are Christians.
In short calling critics of Al Jazeera “Islamophobic douchebags” is like calling critics of CNN "anti-Christian douchebags.
So yes, you’ve made comments which make it clear you think Arab and Muslim are synonymous even though you haven’t explicitly said so.
Like I said, I’ll give you the benefit of the doubt and assume you’re simply stupid and not a bigot.
Nope. I’m far more educated than that. Your attempt to make a a case to the contrary is so asinine that I don’t even really understand it.
I’m sorry, but people who think that Al Jazeera is a Muslim organization are clearly not well-educated.
As I demonstrated, you’ve made statements which claim you think it is.
I’m sorry if you’re ignorant about Muslims and Middle Easterners. I’d be happy to help you learn more if you’re interested, but since you’re incapable of admitting you’re wrong and you moronically accuse Muslim academics of being bigots I don’t see the point.
Anyway, if your internet persona is remotely like your real world persona, do the world a favor and get a vasectomy because someone as stupid as you really shouldn’t reproduce.
Yes, I apologize. I should have used simpler words and added pictures.
Your posting history does not support this.
Dio, you were relatively normal three years ago. What happened?
Is that true?
If Dio is not trolling, if he really does have mental problems, I would feel bad about messing with him.
I’ve had an epiphany - I know who Dio is in real life. He’s Karl Pilkington. One of KP’s funniest foibles is his inability to differentiate his sources of information. He will state as fact things that he sourced from anywhere at all. Someone tells him something and it becomes the gospel. He sees a movie where dinosaurs coexist with man and that becomes his reality.
Sound familiar?
Was this about the time he had his big “I’m leaving the board and you’re all poopy-heads” cryfest?
That never happened.
I don’t think that. You’re confusing me with somebody else. I also know that Islamophobes don’t know the difference, so hatred of Al Jazeera is often rooted in Islamophobia through sheer ignorance. Calling Islamophobia on Al Jazeera bashers does not mean I think Al Jazeera is Muslim. Sorry. I am far better educated than that.