I have this thread in GD on a topic that concerns me greatly (this one, in case you were wondering), and I ended up making two posts in a row at the end of it, mostly because I remembered something that I wanted to say after the edit expiration. However, I’ve now thought of MORE I wanted to say. But no one’s replied to the thread since those two in a row, and I feel strangely reluctant to add a third.
So how many posts in a row are you willing to make in one thread? Does it matter if you started it or not? What do you think of people who make more in a row than you’re willing to make? (Not necessarily here, obviously; any forum or message board will do – heck, even newsgroups count.)
I’ll post whatever amount I feel is appropriate. For example, if I’m responding to several other posts in a thread I’ll probably make each of my responses a seperate post to avoid confusion.
Excluding special cases where it makes sense for someone to deliberately post regular updates or something, the most I can imagine is four, and normally not more than one. Four would be:
What do I think about that? I think blah.
Oops, edit window has closed, I made major typo that makes a sentence too offensive/wildly wrong to just leave.
OK, I’ve gone to look it up, and actually blah-de-blah.
Oops, edit window has closed, I made major typo that makes a sentence too offensive/wildly wrong to just leave. AGAIN. I AM SO SILLY, SORRY!
I don’t mind posting twice because I’ve forgotten something and the edit window has closed. I don’t like posting a third time but would do it if I thought I was adding something to the conversation. I would not post four times unless under special circumstances (say I’d just been in a flood and was posting updates or something.)
Personally, I think you should go for it some time. Wait a couple weeks, pick a slow topic at a slow time, and see how far you can get before a mod complains or someone else comments.