The people who believe the moon landings were a hoax.
AND they believe they are honoring people by flashing their asses at them.
What if it showed he did not play well with others?
We can call them Starving Artists.
No, I emphatically reject this nickname. It’s confusing. It makes them sound like they moon people AND it’s too close to the Moonies.
As this isn’t a debate, I’m moving it to MPSIMS from Great Debates.
“After-birthers” is my favorite of the terms I’ve seen used.
No personal jabs at other Dopers, pls. Reserve your snark for the straw-graspers.
Desperateers.
Sorry to point out the blindingly obvious, but…
As little as the “birther” movement mattered, this matters even less. There’s nothing in the Constitution about a person’s grades. He’s still constitutionally eligible for the office no matter what his grades were. Is this actually a serious thing?
trumpeters
The real ones from the socialist madrasah he went to as a young Muslim boy from Kenya to learn about Islamic socialism.
party pooper!!! ![]()
I think the idea is that Obama duped us into thinking he was smarter than he really was–not that he was ineligible, but that he wouldn’t have won if we’d all known the truth about his background.
Real American Conservatives Identifying Suspected Turncoats.
I like that, it strikes a certain c[del]h[/del]ord.
How about we just call them idiots and be done with it. After all, that’s what they are.
I prefer Trumpers.
Worse, it’s an attack on affirmative action - clearly this dumb black kid got a free ride/free admission to these high-end schools because he’s black. Now if he’d been a dumb white guy who was a legacy, that’d be much better.
Ouch, I think I sprained a muscle doing all that eyerolling.
Why do we have to put a label on everybody?
Because there are many kinds of idiots and many kinds of idiocy, and sometimes labels help the rest of us identify which kind we’re dealing with.