It’s rated 5 stars in every newspaper. Siskel and Ebert gave it two thumbs up. The previews looked alright, theres no one in the cast you hate. The story sounds interesting enough. And everyone you know recoils in horror when they find out that you still just haven’t seen _________.
Anything by Polanski; I’m not watching until he dies.
I have a DVD set of every Bergman film that I haven’t watched yet. I’ll get to that soon. I haven’t seen The Last Picture Show, The 400 Blows, or Nashville yet, though I have all the DVDs.
There are a lot of films out there that other people think are great but I’ll probably never watch because they look like shite to me. The most recent one that comes to mind is Juno. I want to remove my brain and scrub it with Comet whenever I see a preview for that or hear someone talking about it.
I consider myself pretty “well-watched” and I’ve only seen 31 of those. Thirty-five if I count the Godfather and LotR trilogies separately, which they didn’t. Ouch. One of the stranger lists I’ve seen, though. The Jeff Goldblum Fly? Really?
A lot of recent scorsese; The Aviator, The Departed… Just cant be bothered. My tolerance for 2hrs+ movies has waned in recent times, for me, these days, any movie over 85mins doesnt get looked at. Time constraints, see? Needless to say, not a lot of 85min movies are 5star masterworks.
I’ve only seen one or two more than that. What a bizarre list. (Purple Rose of Cairo over any other Woody Allen movie?) And the 1986 The Singing Detective wasn’t a “movie” at all; it was a TV miniseries.