The Department of Homeland Security is in the Constitution? Or has an amendment added it to the Constitution?
If I had more time I might like to pursue your thoughts on this matter, I often enjoy pedantic minutia (and I mean that sincerely – getting down in the weeds and arguing ideas and concepts theoretically delights me -much to annoyance of my friends and especially my family). If I get lots done today I hope to discuss this further later on.
Given your stance on the US Air Force- do you believe the second amendment should apply to any “arms” that do not include single shot muzzle loading firearms (and swords of course) that were available when the constitution was written because that seems most consistent. Or do laser and high energy weapons apply?
One more thing-
It seems to me this is about the federal bench although you cannot prove it by me. You may be speaking about a federal agency that regulates the allocation of Hershey Bars far any who have not reached the age of majority. But if you are speaking about the courts they would be and have been as far as I know, quite fair about making fair and moral decisions based upon law and fact. I would not expect any judge to say leave the bar here and we will tell you our ruling tomorrow. I WOULD expect them to say: "You claim you tried to break it fairly but the damn thing splintered into a 65%-35% mess. You may have one more crack at breaking the larger piece to true up the totals in each pile but the decision still falls to the other sibling. (Now the court may have a bias for older children - - or younger children but they have no stake and no reason to appropriate any portion of the treasure. On the other hand- judges are usually lawyers and I can easily see one of those saying 35% of the prize will go to me, 35% will go to the dissenting justice, and you two may fight over what is left)
If you are not speaking of the federal bench I do understand your statement at all.