When Czarcasm Becomes Invective

I remember my first encounter with you, back when you were Slythe. I was almost brand new, and had opened a thread debating whether atheism is a religion. I remember how you came crashing in, announcing that if you were to encounter God, you would slay Him. What that had to do with the debate, we will never know. Yet somehow, you marshalled the resources to do the unreasonable, the rude, the childish, the inane.

I ran into you again from time to time, as Slythe. With practically every encounter, you were belligerent, intolerant, bombastic, and incredibly obtuse.

Fast forward. Now, you’re a moderator, and (at least ought to be) held to a higher standard of behavior. I know my complaint will go straight into the trash. I can understand that there is comaraderie among moderators, and that they will defend you. Because of your standing, however, the Pit is where I must take my complaint.

First, you allowed the wholesale hijack and slaughter of this thread that I started in your Forum, “In My Humble Opinion”. It was a thread about the Jesus Survivor spoiler that has been circulating on internet radio and various Survivor message boards.

Its Opening Post:

When the jackals descended and began to mutilate the thread, you didn’t raise a finger to stop it. No “Okay folks, let’s stick to the topic”, no “This is ridiculous, I’m moving it to MPSIMS.” Nothing. You just let it get chopped to pieces by ravenous thugs who tore through like denizens on a rampage.

I suspect you did this because you rather enjoyed it. They were, after all, attacking Jesus. Not the Jesus who was the topic, but the Jesus Who is my God. I wouldn’t think the motive was incompetence or sloth or dereliction, was it? But I let it slide, gave the pack the information from Jesus (the union writer), and forgot about it.

Now you’ve crashed this thread where the Pagans have opened one of the many “Ask Me” threads in Great Debates, nagging and taunting them there rather than bringing it to the Pit the way we non-moderators have to. Well, that’s that, and I have no control over it.

You, and people like you, are the ones who give atheism its common reputation as a hand-stabbing philosophy that is ethically bereft. You’re the reason people think atheists can’t be moral. You are your own worst enemy, and will lose your fight to stamp out ignorance because, frankly, people won’t listen to what assholes have to say.

May you find Love and peace, for your own sake and ours.

I see that you’ve apologized for crashing the Pagan thread. That’s progess. Way to go! Now, how 'bout an apology for allowing the gang rape of my IMHO thread… Maybe we’ll become friends.

Yeah, Czarcasm, what the hell were you thinking when you asked somebody to defend their religious beliefs in a GD thread about religious beliefs? Sheesh. Next thing you know, we’ll have people arguing about politics in there!

**Libertarian ** the problem I saw was in how you phrased your OP and title - it invited the kind of joking that you immediately got. I think a thread about “would you like to know” to things would be interesting
“would you like to know the ending of a movie”?
“would you like to know how you will die?”
"would you like to know who won a game before the ending (but not early enough to win a bet) -see I know the audience…

I noticed that you’d stepped in that thread and tried to cajole folks into answering the OP. I doubt that having the moderator doing that would have improved the chances of getting it back on track (ok, so they might have stopped hijacking, but probably wouldn’t have answered it)

FTR, I’m glad I didn’t post what I thought of there (reminded me of my old college days when folks would walk up to you and say “have you seen the Lord today?” and I’d answer "yep, he’s over by Berkey Hall, if you hurry, you can catch him " :smiley: )

Lib, I (for the most part) respect your posts and your take on things. You may have had legitimate beef with Czarcasm regarding the Pagan thread. I haven’t read the related pit thread, so at this point I have no comment regarding that portion of your post.

However, your Jesus thread getting hijacked is nothing unique. Threads get hijacked all the time. I don’t see how you can harp on the mods for “allowing” it to happen. They would need 10 mods in each forum if they were to try to prevent every thread from being hijacked. I think you should it slide.

My 2¢, do with it what you will.

Very well, then. I’ll let it slide. Certainly, I’ve suffered worse offenses. Oh, well. This didn’t amount to much of a Pit rant.

Slaughter! Jackals! Mutilation! Pack of ravenous rampaging thugs and gang rapists!

I had a half-formed thought that perhaps there was a better way to promote the love and peace Lib has such a firm leg up on, but then I lost the reasoning behind it. Now I can’t imagine what it could possibly have been. Oh well.

Some bulletin boards are set up to affix various titles under posters’ names based on number of posts made. I know it’s not the proper forum for feature requests, but could it be possible to implement that feature here? Having just barely broken the three-digit mark myself, I know I’d probably only qualify as a lowly “denizen”, but knowing that if I broke 500 or 1000 or whatnot that I could be promoted to “jackal” and even “gang rapist” would give me more of an impetus to post.

Oooh! Oooh! I wanna be a ravenous thug!

It’s Czarcasm’s first pit thread! Yay!!!

Now, my boy, you are a Moderator. Congratulations :slight_smile:

Oh, andros, why would you want a demotion? You’re alread a jackal! :smiley:

Sounds like a reference to Buddhism. I’ve read more than one book about Buddhism that had koans in it, and most of them included some variation of the following koan: “What should you do if you meet the Buddha on the road?” Answer: “Kill him.” There’s a meaning behind the answer (or multiple meanings), and if this was the reference Czarcasm was trying to make, then the meaning behind the koan is reason enough for his statement.

**

Was it a hijack? Sure looked like it to me. But you should consider that putting a subject title like that on a thread about something else practically guaranteed some jokes and snickers.

**

Ravenous thugs? You also referred to the hijackers as “jackals.” Kinda harsh language for people having fun with your subject title. :rolleyes: Tell me something…is this how you view those who demonstrate even the slightest trace of not being a Christian in the way that you are a Christian?

**

IANA atheist, and I didn’t see any evidence of attacks upon Christianity. Some of the jokes I read there I first heard from Christians. Chill. I think it was left alone because the thread was getting fun. But who knows? I can’t read the moderator’s mind, and neither can you, so it seems you have little foundation for your inferences regarding the thought processes of the moderators, when you have no hard evidence otherwise.

You, and people like you, are the ones who give atheism its common reputation as a hand-stabbing philosophy that is ethically bereft.
[/QUOTE]

I’ve heard of back-stabbing. Haven’t heard of hand-stabbing, unless you’re perhaps referring to that scence from the Michael Douglas movie Black Rain, where some guy gets his hand skewered on a table.

**

Somehow I find it deeply strange to see someone call another an asshole, and then wish that they would find love and peace.

Libertarian, you wrote a good OP that just got hijacked. Hijacks happen. They happen a lot. Not every thread that I’ve seen hijacked gets a warning or a reminder from the moderator. Just because yours wasn’t doesn’t mean that the moderator was passing any kind of moral judgment on it. I think it got hijacked because of the subject title. It would have gotten hijacked anyway because of the guy’s name. The hijack was, IMHO, funny, and I wasn’t offended by anything in it.

I’ve never been impressed with those who are quick to ascribe the worst type of behavior to another person simply because of disagreements on religion. I hope that you are not one of those individuals. Czarcasm doesn’t owe you an apology, IMHO.

Besides, last time I checked, Czarcasm is not the only moderator of the IMHO forum. How come you’re not shrieking about TVeblen’s supposed lapses as a moderator?

Seriously. Life is short. There are certain things in life not worth getting hyped over. Fretting about why your thread was hijacked and why it wasn’t corrected isn’t one of them.

Move on.

My first Pit thread, from Libertarian no less, and this is the best you people can come up with?!? My ghod, this would have passed for a MPSIMS thread, it’s so mild.

Lib, I didn’t mess with the IMHO thread you mentioned because you invited the hi-jacking by way of said thread title. I am surprised that you have nothing to say about the offer made in the mentioned Pit thread that was recinded for the flimsiest of reasons. I was offered a chance to see real “Magic” by someone who obviously thought I wouldn’t be able to accept. When I did accept, with the needed stipulation that the offerer tell his exactly what I would be shown, to prevent misunderstanding, the offer was recinded abruptly, and the person who made the offer complained about the treatment recieved over in a GD thread.

Czar, fair enough. The thread title was a lame attempt at cleverness, a bad pun perhaps. But it certainly did not invite anything like the wholesale trashing it got. I was looking forward to a good discussion about the greatest and most serious spoiler out there from a man who calls himself Jesus. If you say that I can go into threads there in IMHO and, having found an angle by way of the thread title, leave pointless distracting posts at will, then I’ll concede your point.

And yes, you had a legitimate gripe about the shape-shifting thing, but GD wasn’t the place for it. You’ve rectified that. It’s over.

Ah, but Czarcasm, I offered to show you magic, told you I would be on vacation and I leave in St Louis, yet you haven’t responded.

So do you want to see card tricks, or would you prefer to see something more gruesome, like the hat-pit through the arm trick?

As a moderator of another board (MAN have I been wanting to use that!!!) I have to say that Czarcasm/Slythe hasbeen a model poster.

nanner nanner nanner! :stuck_out_tongue:

I’d be all for that. :wink:

[jarbaby stumbles in drunk] HEY…HEY!

You want magic, baby? [burp] I’ll show you some magic, c’mere…

[grabs czar by the back of the neck]

let’s go upstairs…I’ll show you magic, angel cake…

[stumbles away]

jarbaby

sigh

As I have said a few times already, and you seem to LOVE to misstate it:

I recinded my offer not because you can get here easily, but because not only did you make fun of me(and the very acceptable spelling of magic(k)) in the post where you accepted, but you had been insulting me throughout the thread. Why would I want someone in my home who was going to be a jerk and come with a closed mind? You still do not strike me as wanting to learn or disspell ignorance. You seem very attached to your worldview without an ability to drop the attitude and consider that there might be more out there.

And for the third(or is it fourth?) time, would you mind telling us exactly what kind of magic(k) you were prepared to show me, and who(if not me) you would be willing to show it to?

If you look in the GD thread, I answered you already.