Well, I denounce it now.
And yes I DO count as a board conservative, for all that I am proud to be a life-long Democrat.
If you meant to refer exclusively to Pubbies, you should have said “board right-wing reactionaries.”
#wordsmeanthings
He surely is, which raises the question of why so many people are debating and engaging him.
He’s the useful kind that lets us post stuff we want to say anyway. Think of it like arguing with the people he plagiarizes.
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
Oh my god, this guy is a riot! Can we keep him? Can we? 
See, this is why I was laughing. Maybe you really don’t get it. But it’s not simply an assumption that the majority of bigots in this country are christians. Or at least, the majority of bigots with any power are christians.
Who made sodomy between two consenting adults (something that harms nobody) illegal? Christians.
Who pushed back hard against making it legal? Christians.
Who fought tooth and nail against the APA reclassifying homosexuality? Christians.
Who runs the “ex-gay ministries” whose primary effect is abusing children? Christians (mostly gay Christians, as it turns out).
Who pushed for laws that would forbid teachers from talking about homosexuality in schools? Christians.
Who passed and defended the abhorrent statutes in the Anoka-Hennepin school district which effectively prevented teachers from speaking up against anti-gay bullying, which led to a bunch of dead kids? Christians.
Who supports bills which make it legal to discriminate against homosexuals, and opposes bills which tamp down on already-legal discrimination? Christians.
Who went to bat to make it harder for women to get access to legal contraception? Christians.
What religion does the quiverfull movement attribute its bizarre, backwards, misogynistic views to? Christianity.
What religion consistently teaches its children that gay people are sick, diseased, wrong, evil, going to hell, and more? Christifuckinganity.
Which religion has now shifted from anti-gay legislation to anti-trans legislation now that they’ve realized they’ve pretty well and good lost that battle? Do I even have to say it?
And don’t even get me started on Ted Haggard. I could keep going if you’d like. I strongly recommend you take a look at this letter Dan Savage responded to. It’s worth a read if you’re confused about what we’re talking about. Your religion is not as innocent as you might like to think.
Okay, now I’m actually worried there may be something seriously wrong with you. Zero porn on your hard drive? Yikes, dude! I mean, I only have a few gigs, but
Hey, let’s be fair, I showed up here when I was like 16 or something. This place is great. The caliber of discussion is consistently significantly higher than I see literally anywhere else on the internet.
Christians did indeed make anal and oral sodium between males a crime back in the day when it was traditionally viewed as a health hazard and a morally obtuse thing to do. Indeed, after all anal sodomy among males was primarily responsible for the AIDS crisis in the 80s and whatnot. It is Christian teaching that that type of behavior is wrong, but no one wants to criminalize its now. We Christians still oppose anal sodomy when it’s man on boy and man on girl and so forth, but if it’s two consenting adults we don’t think it should be illegal (except if it’s prostitution). We aren’t bigots.
Congratulations, Christians have, by hook or crook, joined us in the 21st century on the issue of “should anal sex be legal”. But don’t you dare pretend that these laws had anything to do with AIDS. Don’t you fucking dare pretend that conservative christians gave a damn about AIDS. They didn’t. Reactions ranged from Falwell and Buchanan saying that AIDS was god’s punishment to Paul Cameron saying that AIDS might mean we have to kill all the gay people to stop its spread. Fucking really. They only cared about it to the degree they could use it as another cudgel to beat the fags with. They only ever started to care when straight people started dying, and yes, that applies to Ronald Reagan as well, who didn’t say anything publicly about the disease until 1985, years after the epidemic had started and the disease was well-known. It took until 1987 before he actually held a speech about the major epidemic that had been raging for years by that time. In private, he joked about it. Gay people dying was a joke to him. So take that bullshit and stuff it.
Meanwhile, you still have the catholic church teaching that condoms don’t work in the parts of Africa most ravaged by the disease. You still have American preachers going to Africa to push things like Uganda’s kill the gays bill (that fucker is getting sued for crimes against humanity).
This also addresses none of the other or more recent additions to the list. Would you like to address any of those? Or maybe I should just point to, among others, the Family Research Council, American Family Association, One Million Moms, Exodus International, and the Vice President of the United States of America, and call it a day.
You guys are putting way too much effort into crafting responses to an established plagiarist/troll. Feed him if you have to, but don’t make it gourmet.
I get that this is an emotional issue for you which is understandable, AIDS killed many people after all. It is however false to say Reagan didn’t mention AIDS publicly until 1987, he in fact mentioned it publiclyin September 1985 at a press conference detailing his budget to deal with AIDS. Reagan also increased funding for AIDS by hundreds of millions of dollars over his 8 years in office. And if he was such a homophobe, that must have been why he won California and New York in both his presidential campaigns, two places that are chock full of ultra-homophobic zealots! (sarcasm) :rolleyes::rolleyes:
You’ll have to give me chapter and verse on this. I’m not seeing it. I can’t see that there ever was an issue about the status and requirements of being a “First Lady” until Debillw3 raised it, precisely in response to the “side argument”. And in that context it was a complete non sequitur. Feel free to point out where I’m going wrong.
You are a bigot, and you’ve just proven it. How generous of you to condemn my life with my husband, without wanting to jail us. And “anal and oral sodium”? Not with my high blood pressure.
Probably true as phrased, but you might want to read up on his modelling agency for some fairly horrific stories of what he has done to women for profit: brought them to America without appropriate visas, paid them well below minimum wage when he bothered to pay them at all, and forced them to live in cramped and squalid conditions for which he deducted money from their pay. “He treats women marginally better than sex traffickers” is not a strong character recommendation.
More recent than that - certainly into the early 20th century and then tapering off until the spoiled Boomer generation.
Yeah, like the Republican base hasn’t made plenty of sexist remarks about Melania. But more of the “I’d rather hit that than Hillary” variety, which I guess should be taken as a compliment to Melania.
Bruh.
Yeah, pretty much all of this is pure fantasy. Consider:
And that’s just the US. You’ll note that there are quite a large number of other countries in which homosexuality remains illegal, and if you actually bother to do the research you’ll find that religion (mostly Christianity and Islam) is the main driver of these laws.
In conclusion, the way to stop your brown sugar from solidifying is to keep making cookies until you use it all up. I know it’s a sacrifice but it needs to be done.
Jesus, son. Shut the fuck up.
And you aren’t the official spokesperson for all of Christianity. You may know something about whatever sect you belong to that deems itself to be “Christian”, at best.
It was quite remarkable foresight by which your religion thoughtfully chose to condemn a behaviour some 1970 or more years before it started spreading a deadly disease.
I feel like I need to make a wisecrack about syphilus and heterosexual behaviour here but I can’t bothered.
No need to get salty.
When Debillw3 responded to Lobohan, you said this:
(Emphasis added.) The italicized portion seems to me to be an aspect of “status and requirements” for the position, as it clearly seems, based on their replies to Lobohan and then to you, to Debillw3 as well.
But I’m sure the poster can type for her/himself, so I’ll yield the argument. I interjected only because I find it intriguing when two people in basic agreement argue past each other because of slight differences of perspective or detail. (“Trees” vs. “Forest” stuff.)
(embiggening mine)
The gutless little plagiarist also fails reading comprehension forever. Honors student, my foot.
On preview: Left Hand of Dorkness beat me to it, but it’s funny enough to point out twice.
It was a block of big text, and it was late at night. Human error happens
Especially from plagiarizing, gutless cowards. Those folks seem to make an awful lot of errors.
Kind of like Trump lying for years about Obama, continuing it today with the wiretapping lies, and being forced to apologize to the UK because his staff implicated them with no evidence.
Makes sense that you feel so close to Trump – liars and plagiarist and the gutless probably need to stick together.