Where The Hell Did This Piers Morgan Craziness Come From?

Not to speak out of turn, but I dust mine with powdered sugar every morning, like pfeffernusse. Purely a precautionary measure, of course.
Oh, and I have no idea what a Piers Morgan is.

I meant as in “-hole” or possibly “fucking wanker”.

Ah. Synonym trouble.

I’m guessing that FOX News Channel so dominates its competition from 8-11 every night that all the mainstream (i.e., liberal) media are working together to try to take them down. Looks to me like they’re all pinning their hopes on Piers Morgan.

You think the liberal media are pinning their hopes on Piers Morgan? Dude, take your head out of the echo chamber once in a while. There is no liberal media conspiracy. Liberals simply aren’t that organized. And besides, any liberal with any passing familiarity with Morgan hates him.

That’s like the crew of the Titanic pinning their hopes on the boat anchor.

The story I heard was that years ago he heard a rumor that Madonna might be pregnant. When he called her people to find out what was going on, they told him that it was absolutely not true, somebody was pulling his leg, etc., etc.

And then the very next day, she announced she was expecting.

So, yeah, he’s been pretty bitter about it ever since.

Well, before that he was a minor columnist, editing the Bizarre gossip column, where he managed to be a libellous arsehole too, IIRC; I was a kid and I still remember what seemed like half the columns having to include official retractions for lies in previous columns.

I’ve realised I’m wrong about him having sold his soul to the devil, however; that would require him to have a soul in the first place.

Yeah. Piers Morgan as a liberal figurehead? Perhaps Clegg’s version of the LibDems, actually, but they don’t count any more.

Didn’t he make some stupid headlines with some ridiculous conspiracy claims about Princess Diana? Or am I coming up with the wrong french named “reporter”?

Cheesesteak said:

I’d rather not pierce my morgan, if it’s all the same with you.

Sounds more like the Daily Express than the Daily Mirror (under Morgan or otherwise), to be honest.

Would it be possible to explain this?

You know the word homicide, meaning “to kill a human”, and suicide meaning “to kill oneself”, from the Latin? Well, countryside means “to kill Piers Morgan”. Hope this helps*.

  • it’s a play on the word “cunt” :wink:

Not only does it help, I’m now having trouble not laughing.

:dubious: I never said there was a conspiracy. More of a “birds of a feather” school of thinking.

Morgan was also Donald Trump’s first Celebrity Apprentice.

This thread was totally worth the price admission, for the sweet ballsackness and Fry’s wit, which I am glad to have explained to me.

I was vaguely aware of Morgan and his vulgarian past. He seemed to be perfectly slotted with Sharon Osbourne and David Hasselhoff on America’s Got (No) Talent. A C-lister that gets bumped to the B because of his accent.

I actually grew to like him somewhat on The Celebrity Apprentice, mainly because he was pitted against all which is evil, Omarosa. Which is saying something about how toxic she is - making Piers Morgan appear pitiable. But he was quite clever and likable there.

I think he must give the best BJs in the entertainment biz, because I have no idea how he scored the Larry King gig. That’s the kind of opportunity you think a former TV news anchor might snag. What’s Dan Rather doing nowadays? But he got it, and is about to slide his slippers under the bed of CNN’s viewership. If he doesn’t get caught in some horrible scandal and the ratings are decent, he can do this until he dies, and then a few years after (see Larry King).

I am amused that Clarkson tried to twat Morgan. On the Concorde, no less. How annoying do you have to be to out-annoy Clarkson?

Yeah, I don’t know who he is, either. I’ve seen commercials for his show, but until just the past few days I couldn’t figure out why they’d give Piers Anthony a talk show. Now I know there are two men with the name Piers, but that’s about it in regards to Piers #2.

He’s got a show on HDNet these days. But as far as CNN is concerned he’s damaged goods. The rightwingers would have a field day if they hired him. And seeing as how CNN’s business model seems to be to try to please everyone, even if it just waters down their product, they couldn’t have that.

This is total nonsense. The only people with a vested interest in his success are CNN; the rest of the coverage was because Larry King was on TV for so long and some people are interested in who is replacing him. You can see the same thing with the coverage of Regis Philbin’s retirement. Right now they’re covering the announcement, and when someone replaces him or a new show replacing his, that will get a little coverage, too.

All the networks want strong ratings. It’s not a team sport, it’s not Everybody vs. Fox, and they do not care if someone gets “taken down.” If CNN gets a hit show, that’s good for CNN and nobody else. It’s bad for Fox if they take away Fox viewers, but then again they might take viewers from ABC or CBS or any other network, so it’s not in the interests of those networks to help CNN.

The cross promotional whoring juggernaut goes on. I guess every major celebrity interview he does will be CNN’s top story the following day for the rest of this week. Today CNN.com’s top story right now is “Howard Stern: ‘I don’t like Jay Leno.’” So fucking what? This isn’t news; a lot of people have said they don’t like Leno in the last year-plus. Yesterday the top story in the morning was his interview with Oprah. Good for CNN for finally giving Oprah some media exposure, by the way.

If you liked that, you’ll like this: Piers Morgan is a country member.