What I always find with boobs is that I wind up finding one woman more attractive than another, and can’t place why. For some reason, when I look at boobs directly, they don’t seem nearly as appealing as seeing them as a part of the overall package.
My point is that even I noticed Ms. Spektor’s boobs, even though I didn’t notice Ms. Johansson’s.
My understanding was that in a lot of the earlier pre-photoshop pre-implant days there also a lot of breast “taping” going on. I’m not sure what that involves but I’m assuming it allowed holding breasts at gravity defying postions for photos.
Thought about this for years, no contest-Anita Ekberg. Pre silicon, pre photo shop pre-cisely! Great face legs and fabulous skin! Having met her I can vouch for her “authenticity”! Check out this fabulous Ekberg website http://anitaekberg.free.fr And to balance between the abundance of the curvy Ekberg there is the lovely small breasts of Elsa Martinelli.
With the tsunami of silicon -enhanced breasts large breasted women are getting a bad rap. Huge breasts on the skinniest body are ludicrous, proportion is the key and lovely skin enhances the overall effect.
I’m not providing any photographic evidence, but the best bust I have ever seen is my wife’s. A nice C cup, still firm and not droopy at 43, and the thing that makes them the best? I can play with them whenever I want.